论日落复审制度中倾销和损害可能性认定-on the determination of dumping and damage possibility in sunset review system.docxVIP

论日落复审制度中倾销和损害的可能性认定中文提要I论日落复审制度中倾销和损害的可能性认定中文提要中文提要乌拉圭回合之前，国际反倾销法并没有规定反倾销实施期限，很多国家为了 获得短期经济利益而滥用反倾销措施，这就给国际贸易以及全球经济带来了消极 影响。为了抑制这种现象，乌拉圭回合谈判规定了日落复审制度。然而事与愿违，由于《反倾销协定》中对日落复审制度的规定太过笼统，各 国行政机关的自由裁量权过于宽泛，致使实践中出现大量的“日不落”现象。当 今时代背景下，激进的“自动日落”制度遥不可及，遏制“日不落”现象仍应基 于现有的日落复审制度。倾销和损害的可能性认定是日落复审制度中的核心部分， 而构建一个更为客观的认定标准是解决“日不落”问题的关键。在这一点上，美 国虽然有较为详尽的法律规范，但总体说来对可能性的认定过于依赖主观推断， 相较之下欧盟与中国更倾向于以实际发生的数据来说明问题。《反倾销协定》可以参考欧盟与中国的做法增加新的规定，将认定“可能性” 的因素限定在已经实际发生的客观因素之内，并禁止各国权力机关自动立案。如 此将有望在一定程度上缓解“日不落”现象。关键词 日落复审 反倾销协定 可能性认定作者：赵晓涵 导师：孙莉英文摘要论日落复审制度中倾销和损害的可能性认定A STDUY ON THE “LIKELIHOOD ”OF INJURY AND DUMPING IN SUNSET REVIEWAbstractThe world’s antidumping multilateral legal system does not require the implementation period of antidumping before the Uruguay Round, That gives international trade and the global economy had a negative impact for the abuse of anti-dumping measures by most of country. Then the Uruguay Round established the Sunset Review for the purpose of reducing the abuse of the anti-dumping measures. However, things go contrary to ones wishes. A large number of “sun never set” phenomenon occurs in practice because ADA’s provisions of sunset review is too general and member country has lots of discretion.Therefore, this article aim to explore the core issues, determination of likelihood of continuation or recurrence of injury and dumping, of sunset review from inside.First, this article insisted the anti-dumping is not a punitive act but a point of view of a country’s domestic industry temporary relief measure based on the economic theory, then describes the negative economic effects of anti-dumping measures to demonstrate that the anti-dumping measures shall be terminated at a certain time. Second , this article has analysis the relevant legal provisions and practice content of WTO, the EU, the US and China by comparative analysis and case analysis. Then, this article point that Article 11.3 of ADA is too vague about the way to determine “likelihood” of continuation or recurrence