- 1、本文档共52页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Using De Bono’s Six Thinking Hats for Creative Thinking,…
Using De Bono’s Six Thinking Hats for Creative Thinking, Effective Decision Making, Engaged Meetings, and Faster Problem Solving
Welcome
Welcome
Six Thinking Hats In The Library
Blue
Process
White
Objective
Red
Intuitive
Green
Creative
Yellow
Positive
Black
Cautious
Before 6 Thinking Hats
After 6 Thinking Hats
Today’s Outline
I. Why Thinking Matters
II. De Bono
III. 6 Thinking Hats
IV. Tutu Example
V. Group Exercise
V. In Conclusion
I. Why Thinking Matters
Thinking about Thinking
Thinking is like breathing – we take it for granted. But how we think is just as vital to our lives as leaders as breathing is to live. (Thinking about Thinking, 1993, p.70).
We ALL Think we are “Right”
All of us assume that the way we think is the “right” way
Thinking often proceeds as waffle and reaction to what turns up from moment to moment
How we think dictates our approach and therefore our behaviors
When we fail at something, we ascribe it to be bad luck, we seldom take the view that the way we thought about it was part of the problem
Thinking Causes Confusion
We involve too much in the thinking process
We inappropriately get our emotions, ethics, values, ruts, friendships, intelligences, gender issues, experiences, creativity, flexibility, learning styles, opinions, and thinking styles involved in decision making and problem solving situations
Thinking Stew
Suggestions, judgment, criticism, information, and plain emotion become all mixed together in a sort of thinking stew
Classic Overthinking
II. Edward De Bono
Considered the father of lateral thinking
Concluded that the only people satisfied with their thinking skills were POOR THINKERS who believed that the purpose of thinking was to prove yourself right
Believed that people needed to embrace the concept of thinking ONE THING at a time
This allows thinkers to separate emotion and other baggage from logic
Lateral Thinking
Thinking to resolve problems with an indirect and creative approach, using reasoning t
文档评论(0)