慢性肥厚性鼻炎四种改进术式疗效比较.docVIP

慢性肥厚性鼻炎四种改进术式疗效比较.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
慢性肥厚性鼻炎四种改进术式疗效比较

慢性肥厚性鼻炎四种改进术式疗效比较   [摘要] 目的 比较四种改进术式与传统方法在慢性肥厚性鼻炎治疗中的优劣。 方法 将2010年6月~2011年1月本科诊断为慢性肥厚性鼻炎的280例患者分为四组。A组:82例行微波治疗;B组:83例行低温等离子消融治疗;C组:65例行下鼻甲骨-黏膜剥离术治疗;D组:50例行下鼻甲骨骨折术治疗。 结果 四组中A组短期疗效好,B组创伤小、恢复快、长期效果好,C组长期效果好,但创伤大、操作稍复杂,D组长期效果好、创伤小、操作简单。A、B、C、D组6个月后总有效率分别为60.98%、84.34%、86.15%、82.00%。A组长期总有效率与其他比较差异均有高度统计学意义(均P 0.05)。四组均无明显后遗症。 结论 低温等离子消融及下鼻甲骨骨折治疗慢性肥厚性鼻炎有良好临床疗效,可于临床广泛应用。   [关键词] 慢性肥厚性鼻炎;微波;低温等离子;改进   [中图分类号] R765.21 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2012)02(a)-0036-02      Comparison of the curative effects of four kinds of improved operation type in treatment of chronic hypertrophic rhintis   ZHANG Shineng LIAN Junsheng LI Yujie YU Min   Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Zhengzhou Central Hospital, Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450007, China   [Abstract] Objective To compare four kinds of improved operation type in treatment of chronic hypertrophic rhinitis with traditional methods of quality. Methods 280 cases with chronic hypertrophic rhinitis from June 2010 to January 2011 were divided into four groups randomly. Group A: 82 cases of chronic hypertrophic rhinitis (HR) were treated by microwave. Group B:83 cases of HR were treated by frequency ablation temperature-controlled radio. Group C: 65 cases of HR were treated by inferior nasal concha mucosal dissection. Group D: 50 cases of HR were treated by inferior turbinate bore fracture. Results Among four groups, the short term effect was good in group A; group B was less trauma, quicker recovery, the long term effect was good. The trauma was large, the long term effcet was good and more complex operation in group C; group D had the advantage of long-term good effect, less trauma, simple operation. Four groups of HR were followed up half year after operation, effective rate was 60.98% (group A), 84.34% (group B), 86.15% (group C), 82.00% (group D) respectively. Group A compared with group B, group C and group D, effective rate had significant difference among them (all P 0.05).There was no significant s

文档评论(0)

317960162 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档