corrective feedback纠错反馈【ppt】.pptVIP

A Review of the Researches in Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition;Content;1、Error correction Corrective Feedback;2、Types of Corrective feedback;Oral corrective feedback during class;Written corrective feedback;3、Theoretical rationales of corrective feedback; 4、Research in corrective feedback;Research in oral CF during class;Teachers recast;Sheen(2006) ;Learners uptake;Loewen (2005) found that learners successful uptake in classroom-based communicative lessons was a strong predictor of their ability to subsequently correct their errors in tailor-made tests administered to individual students. Loewen and Philp (2006) investigated the effect of different characteristics of recasts (e.g., linguistic focus, length, number of changes, segmentation) on individual learners’ uptake and acquisition, as measured by tailor-made tests. They found that those recasts with explicit linguistic characteristics were more likely to result in both uptake and learning. ;Learners noticing;NabeiSwain(2002);Research in oral CF during class;2. the empirical research in the traditional college English classroom Ge Xianru Gao Yuying(2005) Based on the analysis of a questionnaire on teachers and learners perception of the corrective feedback at classroom language teaching ,this article aims to find out their differences and similarities in viewing corrective feedback and different feedback types. Meanwhile, an attempt is made to figure out students preference in feedback types so as to inform teachers of effective and successful feedback. Result shows that although the teachers and students all think corrective feedback is good for classroom teaching, students favorite feedback way is inconsistent with teachers commonly used way.;Wang Xiaohui(2011) Teachers beliefs affect their teaching practices, and they are the most effective standards of predicting teaching quality and teaching effect. This paper reports a case study focusing on three college English teachers to explore