Unit Three Introduction Relevant Considerations in Takings Cases三单元相关的考虑在征用的案例介绍.pptVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约1.12万字
约 35页
2018-06-18 发布于福建
举报
版权申诉

Unit Three Introduction Relevant Considerations in Takings Cases三单元相关的考虑在征用的案例介绍.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Unit Three Introduction Relevant Considerations in Takings Cases三单元相关的考虑在征用的案例介绍

Mahon DQ106: Demsetz Takings Story (Radium) Decision: Do CCs undermine surface when they mine? Old Rule: Can undermine surface if own subsidence rights Externalities?: Tricky Issue Mahon: Externalities Contract Rights Direct harm to surface owners not an externality b/c not external to decisions/activities of CCs. CCs paid surface owners in advance for subsidence As if Hadacheck sold land around factory On condition that they’d allow brickworks to continue despite dust, etc.; and Paid separately for the condition Mahon: Externalities Contract Rights Direct harm to surface owners not an externality b/c not external to decisions/activities of CCs. Possible externalities beyond direct harm to surface owners? Mahon: Externalities Contract Rights Direct harm to surface owners not an externality b/c not external to decisions/activities of CCs. Externalities beyond direct harm to surface owners Costs to society of loss of surface value dislocation Loose parallel: Contract to infect person w contagious disease to test treatment: voluntary to subject, not to others who might get disease from subject Could do analysis like “Contract void as against public policy”: Not allow or enforce agreement that has large costs no non-contracting parties * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Music: Carole King, Tapestry (1971) 1L Elective Choices: I’ll Review Mon/Tue Nov 12-13 Analysis of Evidence Family Law * Immigration International Environmental Law Law Social Justice * Legislation Substantive Criminal Law RADIUMTakings Theorist #1:Joseph Sax DQ104-05 Takings Theorists: Joseph SaxDQ104 (Radium) Sax’s First Formulation Distinction Between: “Government-as-Enterpriser” “Government-as-Arbiter.” For Each: Definition? Examples? What Sax Sees as Consequence and Why? Takings Theorists: Joseph SaxDQ104 (Radium) Sax’s First Formulation “Government-as-Enterpriser” Classic uses of Eminent Domain (Road, School etc.) Taking land for govt