复件 写作评估方式及标准.docVIP

关键词：评估，PTA； 写作多种评估方法 参考书目《课堂语言能力评价》Andrew D. Cohen (美) 著，外语教学与研究出版社，2009,7. p 329-331 Holistic scoring 5-1 Similar to TEM-4 or 8 scoring 5- the main idea in each of the articles is stated very clearly, and there is a clear statement of change of opinion. The essay is well organized and coherent. The choice of vocabulary is excellent. There are no major or minor grammatical errors. Spelling and punctuation are fine. 4- the main idea in each of the articles is fairly clear, and there is a clear statement of change of opinion is evident. The essay is moderately well organized and is relatively coherent. The vocabulary is good. There are only minor grammatical errors. There are a few spelling and punctuation errors. 3- the main idea in each of the articles and a change of opinion are indicated but not so clearly. The essay is not so well organized and is somewhat lacking in coherence. The vocabulary is fair. There are some major and minor grammatical errors. There are a fair number of spelling and punctuation errors. 2- the main idea in each of the articles and change of opinion are hard to identify in this essay. The essay is poorly organized and relatively incoherent. The use of vocabulary is weak, and grammatical errors appear frequently. Spelling and punctuation errors are frequent. 1- the main idea in each of the articles and change of opinion are absent in this essay. The essay is poorly organized and generally incoherent. The use of vocabulary is weak, and grammatical errors appear very frequently. Spelling and punctuation errors are very frequent. TEM-8 EVALUATION STANDARD 最高档： 20-18分 Content: The writing effectively addresses the writing tasks. Structure and cohesion: it demonstrates a well-developed logical organizational structure with clearly stated main ideas and sufficient supporting details. Spelling and grammar: It has almost no errors of vocabulary, spelling, punctuation or syntax, and it displays an adequate ability to use the language