A Reliability Generalization of the Life Satisfaction Index一个对生活满意度指数可靠性的推广.pptVIP

下载本文档

3
0
约3.44千字
约 11页
2018-06-24 发布于四川
举报
版权申诉

A Reliability Generalization of the Life Satisfaction Index一个对生活满意度指数可靠性的推广.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

A Reliability Generalization of the Life Satisfaction Index一个对生活满意度指数可靠性的推广

A Reliability Generalization of the Life Satisfaction Index K. A. Wallace J. C. Caruso University of Montana Purpose To examine score reliability for a widely used measure of life satisfaction, the Life Satisfaction Index (LSI; Neugarten et al., 1961) Developing Ratings of Life Satisfaction Crafted to assess well-being using a subjective evaluation of one’s own present and/or past life Part of the Kansas City Study of Adult Life (Neugarten et al., 1961) Thematic analysis of measures of adjustment and morale 5 components of well-being: Zest versus apathy Resolution and fortitude Congruence between desired and achieved goals Self-concept Positive mood tone The Scales Life Satisfaction Index A (LSIA) Life Satisfaction Index B (LSIB) Life Satisfaction Index Z (LSIZ; Wood et al., 1969) 18-item version (Adams, 1969) 8-item version (LSIW; James et al., 1986) 30-item version (Maynard, 1993) Reliability Generalization Meta-analytic technique Examines average score reliability (e.g., Vacha-Haase, 1998) Examines relationships between study characteristics and score reliability Method – Data Collection PsycINFO literature search Life satisfaction index and LSI 157 possible articles 59.87% no mention of reliability 9.56% indicated LSI reliable test, no data 6.37% cited reliability from previous work 3.18% reported reliability in unusable form .64% not empirical 1.27% could not be obtained 19.11% (30) provided usable reliability information Total of 34 samples used Descriptive Statistics for Sample Characteristics (N=34) Results Average Score Reliability Mean = .79 (SD = .10) Median = .79 Range of .56 (.42 to .98) Bivariate correlations Score reliability was not significantly related to: scale length, mean age, standard deviation of age, proportion female, sample size, mean LSI, or standard deviation LSI t tests No difference in score reliability as function of language of administration or sample type Discussion Adequate average score reliability for the LSI File dr