暴力索财类案件的定性分析分析——赵某抢劫案分析报告-qualitative analysis of cases of violence for money - analysis report of zhao mous robbery case.docxVIP

Thefourthpart:Qualitativecountermeasurestoviolenceforpropertycases.Toconcludeeffectivewaysofsolvingqualitativedifferencesfromthreeaspects:subjectivefactors,determinationoflegalinterests,particularformofviolence,clearanddefinitepunishmentscopeofthecrimeofrobbery,extortionandstir-up-trouble.Thefifthpart:conclusion.Keywords:violenceforproperty；dispute；qualitativeanalysis目录引言............................................................................................................................1一、案件基本情况.......................................................................................................2（一）案由................................................................................................................2（二）案情介绍........................................................................................................2（三）分歧意见........................................................................................................3（四）争议焦点........................................................................................................5二、争议焦点问题的法理分析..................................................................................6（一）主观要素对定性的意义................................................................................6（二）法益的确定对定性的意义..........................................................................15（三）当场暴力手段的具体形式对定性的意义..................................................17三、争议案件定性分析.............................................................................................23（一）赵某主观要素的分析..................................................................................23（二）赵某行为所侵犯的法益的分析..................................................................25（三）赵某的暴力手段的具体形式的分析..........................................................25四、暴力索财类案件定性的对策.............................................................................26（一）判定行为人的主观目的和动机..................................................................27（二）综合评判受侵害的法益..............................