消解与建构——论许地山作品的独特性-deconstruction and construction - on the uniqueness of xu dishans works.docxVIP

I I 摘 要 摘 要 许地山被学界认为是中国现代文学史上“最有特点的作家”之一，他的文学创作表 现出浓郁的宗教氛围和异域色彩，同时体现了作家对人间现世的终极关怀。本文选取与 以往研究不同的视角，对许地山作品的独特性加以阐释，即通过对文本的细读，试图发 现许地山作品中作者意在消解的因素，如浮躁利己的爱情、个人中心、知识中心以及权 威中心。同时，理清许地山从“破”到“立”的思想发展脉络，从而进一步阐明许地山 的仁爱、涵容、多元共生思想的建构性价值和当代意义。 许地山作品的独特性源于他渊博的学识和丰富的阅历，对佛教和道教的深入研究使 他对世间百态和生命的意义有了形而上的独特理解，超凡入圣成为他精神之乡的自主追 求。许地山在热情讴歌并肯定爱情美好的同时，从宗教视角出发揭示了爱情自私利己的 一面，希望帮助人们从狭隘的贪爱中解脱出来，转向无我利他的大爱。以此为基础，许 地山进而做出了瓦解个人中心的努力，他深刻地意识到，跳出了自我中心的怪圈，一个 人才有可能逐渐放下私欲，处变不惊，消解怨怼，真正从利己转向利他。此外，从文化 层面来看，在儒家学说被解构的大背景下，许地山能够以超前的姿态解构舶来文化、深 入底层寻找传统文化伦理中的积极因素，从而构建合理的人生观。总之，许地山在重建 人的精神价值方面所做的努力，无论对改造个人的灵魂，培养优秀道德方面，还是优化 社会风尚，开启多元对话，促进中国社会与世界和谐方面都有不可低估的价值。 关键词 许地山 消解与建构 当代意义 II II Abstract Abstract Hsu Tishan has been considered to be one of the most characteristic writers in the modern literary history of China .His literary creations show a strong religious atmosphere and exotic colors, and they embody the ultimate concern about earthly mortals. In this thesis， I select a different angle from that of the previous research, trying to account for the uniqueness of Hsu Tishans works. Namely, by close reading of the text, Im trying to find destructive factors, such as fickle love, egoism, knowledge center and the authoritative center. Meanwhile, I try to discover the inner clue from deconstruction to reconstruction. Furthermore, the contemporary significance of benevolence, tolerance and coexistence which is reflected in Hsus works will be clarified. The uniqueness of Hsu Tishans works comes from his thorough knowledge and rich experience. It is his research in Buddhism and Taoism that brings in his metaphysical unique understanding to the world and the meaning of life. He involuntarily pursues the loftiness and divinity in his spiritual world. On one hand, Hsu enthusiastically eulogizes true love, and on the other hand, he reveals the selfish side of love from a religious angle, hoping to help people be freed from excessively selfish love and turn to loving others with anatman. Based on this, Hsu thus attempts to