MECT治疗精神障碍不良反应及相关因素分析.docVIP

MECT治疗精神障碍不良反应及相关因素分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
MECT治疗精神障碍不良反应及相关因素分析

MECT治疗精神障碍不良反应及相关因素分析   摘 要 目的:探讨无抽搐电休克治疗(modified electroconvulsive therapy,MECT)术后不良反应及其相关因素。方法:对2014年到2015年期间,在上海市嘉定区精神卫生中心住院期间接受MECT治疗的964例精神障碍患者进行MECT术后不良事件的记录和比较。结果:共报告不良事件119例(12.34%);女性报告不良事件的发生率显著高于男性(χ2=13.964,P=0.000)。不同精神疾病的不良事件报告率存在显著差异(χ2=9.736,P=0.004),其中情感性障碍的不良事件报告率最高。丙泊酚麻醉后导致近记忆减退的发生率显著高于依托咪酯(χ2=8.111,P=0.005);而依托咪酯麻醉后导致急性谵妄的发生率显著高于丙泊酚(χ2=9.201,P=0.003)。结论:MECT在治疗上总体安全,但也应注意其不良反应并及时处理,特别是发生意识不清(急性谵妄)时,应密切观察。   关键词 MECT 丙泊酚 依托咪酯 不良反应   中图分类号:R749.054 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1006-1533(2016)05-0053-03   Adverse event and related factors analysis of modified electro-convulsive therapy in the treatment of mental disorder*   CHEN Xiangchun1, WANG Yaping1, JIANG Wenqing2,WU Yan2**   (1. Jiading Mental Health Center, Shanghai 201806, China; 2. Shanghai Mental Health Center,   School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)   ABSTRACT Objective: To explore the adverse event and related factors of modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT) on patients with mental disorder. Methods: The data of post-operative adverse events in the patients who received MECT during hospitalization from 2014 to 2015 in Jiading Mental Health Center, Shanghai were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The adverse events were seen in 119 cases of patients( 12.34%) and the incidence of adverse events was significant higher in female than male(χ2=13.964, P=0.000). There existed some obvious differences in the reported incidence of adverse events in different kinds of mental disorders (χ2=9.736, P=0.004), in which the highest occurred in the patients with affective disorder. The incidence of recency memory decline caused by propofol anesthesia was obviously higher than that by etomidate(χ2=8.111, P=0.005)while the incidence of acute delirium caused by etomidate was higher than that by propofol(χ2=9.201, P=0.003). Conclusion: MECT is a safe and effective treatment method in clinic, but the adverse reaction should be carefully monitored and intervened in time, espe

文档评论(0)

3471161553 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档