- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
两种内固定方法治疗Schatzker Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折临床分析
两种内固定方法治疗Schatzker Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折的临床分析
[摘要] 目的 探讨锁定钢板内固定与传统解剖钢板内固定治疗Schatzker Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折的临床疗效与预后效果,为相关骨折的治疗提供参考。 方法 将Schatzker Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折患者80例根据入院顺序分为治疗组与对照组,每组各40例。两组内固定前、后处理方法相同,对照组采用传统解剖钢板内固定,治疗组采用锁定钢板内固定。 结果 治疗组术后与术后3个月胫骨平台内翻角(TPA)角度与对照组相比无明显变化,差异无统计学意义(P 0.05),但后倾角(PA)角度明显增大,与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。随访3个月进行观察,治疗组的患肢膝关节活动度与患肢膝关节功能评分(HSS值)均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 相对于传统解剖钢板,锁定钢板内固定治疗Schatzker Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折能有效改善后倾角,有利于患者术后患肢膝关节的恢复,值得推广应用。
[关键词] Schatzker Ⅵ型;胫骨平台骨折;解剖钢板;锁定钢板
[中图分类号] R681.8 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2012)01(c)-0048-02
The clinical analysis of two kinds of internal fixation methods in the treatments of Schatzker Ⅵ tibial plateau fracture
ZHANG Xiaoqing JIA Li CHEN Zhen
The First Department of Orthopedics, the Central Hospital of Shangluo City, Shaanxi Province, Shangluo 726000, China
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the clinical effects and prognosis of locking plate fixation and traditional anatomy plate fixation in the treatment of Schatzker Ⅵ tibial plateau fracture, in order to provide reference for the treatment of related fracture. Methods 80 cases of patients with Schatzker Ⅵ tibial plateau fractures were equally divided into treatment group and control group, each group had 40 cases. Processing methods of the two groups before and after internal fixation were similar. The control group was treated with traditional anatomical fixation, the treatment group was treated with locking plate fixation. Results The angle of TPA was compared between the two groups postoperation and 3 months after operation, there was no significant difference (P 0.05), but the angle of PA of treatment group was significantly larger than that of control group, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). After 3 months follow-up observation, the affected limb knee-joint ROM and the affected limb knee-joint function grade (HSS values) of the treatment group were significantly better than those of the control group, the differences were stat
文档评论(0)