中药颗粒剂雾化吸入治疗小儿外感咳嗽疗效观察.docVIP

中药颗粒剂雾化吸入治疗小儿外感咳嗽的疗效观察 　　[摘要] 目的 研究中药颗粒剂雾化吸入与常规药物雾化吸入对小儿外感咳嗽的治疗效果比较。方法 选取2012年4月―2014年4月2年间在该院接受治疗的小儿外感咳嗽患者126例，按照随机数字表法分为实验组63例和对照组63例。实验组采用中药颗粒剂雾化吸入方式进行治疗，对照组采用常规药液雾化吸入方式治疗。治疗2周后对患儿的治疗效果进行统计学分析。结果 实验组患者治疗有效率高达85.7%，而对照组仅为25.4%，两组数据比较，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论 中药颗粒剂雾化吸入与常规药物雾化吸入对小儿外感咳嗽相比用药快捷方便，直接作用于患处，可以根据患者治疗进展改变用药量，安全性高，无副作用，不良反应少，起效快，治疗效果明显。 　　[关键词] 雾化吸入；小儿外感咳嗽；中药颗粒 　　[中图分类号] R27 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742（2014）11（c）-0033-03 　　[Abstract] Objective To study and compare the effect between Chinese medicine granules atomizing inhalation and conventional medicine atomizing inhalation on children with exogenous cough. Methods 126 children with exogenous cough admitted in our hospital from April 2012 to April 2014 these two years were selected and divided into the experimental group and the control group with 63 cases in each according to the random number table method. The experimental group was treated by Chinese medicine granules atomizing inhalation， and the control group was treated by the conventional liquid atomizing inhalation. And the treatment effect was analyzed statistically after 2 weeks of treatment. Results The treatment response rate of the patients in the experimental group was up to 85.7%， while that in the control group was only 25.4%， the difference between the two sets of data was statistically significant （P0.05）. Conclusion For children with exogenous cough， compared with the conventional medicine atomizing inhalation， Chinese medicine granules atomizing inhalation is more convenient and has no side effects， which can directly affect the infected area， and the dosage can be changed according to the treatment progress with higher safety， less adverse reactions， rapider onset and more obvious treatment effect 　　[Key words] Atomizing inhalation； Children with exogenous cough； Chinese medicine granules 　　雾化吸入技术已得到了越来越广泛的临床应用，但一般认为雾化技术应配以西药进行疾病的治疗[1-2]，目前国内对中药颗粒剂雾化吸入的报道少之又少，为研究中药颗粒剂雾化吸入与常规药物雾化吸入对小儿外感咳嗽的治疗效果比较，现分析2012年4月―2014年2月间该院收治的126例小儿外感咳嗽患者的临床资料，