临床护理路径在无痛内镜诊疗患者中效果评价.doc

临床护理路径在无痛内镜诊疗患者中效果评价.doc

  1. 1、本文档共12页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
临床护理路径在无痛内镜诊疗患者中效果评价

临床护理路径在无痛内镜诊疗患者中的效果评价   [摘要]目的 研究临床护理路径在无痛内镜诊疗患者中的效果。方法 选取2014年2月~2014年10月在我院接诊的80例进行无痛内镜诊疗的患者作为研究对象,根据其不同的护理模式,将其分为对照组、研究组,每组40例。对照组患者进行常规的护理,研究组患者在对照组患者的基础上采用临床护理路径,检测并记录两组患者诊疗前后的收缩压以及心率等生命体征、两组患者护理满意度、不良反应的发生情况以及跌倒率等,并对其结果进行比较分析。结果 在诊疗前,两组患者的收缩压以及心率差异无统计学意义(P0.05),与诊疗前比较,研究组患者的收缩压显著增高,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),对照组患者的收缩压诊疗前后无明显变化(P0.05),心率显著增快,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);诊疗后,研究组患者的收缩压高于对照组、心率慢于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。研究组患者的护理总满意率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),研究组患者的不良反应总发生率为7.5%,跌倒率为2.5%,显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 临床护理路径可以显著降低无痛内镜诊疗后患者的跌倒率,有利于诊疗的顺利进行,具有临床应用价值。   [关键词]临床护理路径;无痛内镜诊疗;跌倒   [中图分类号] R473.6 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2018)1(a)-0183-03   [Abstract]Objective To study the effects of clinical nursing pathway in painless endoscopic diagnosis and treatment. Methods 80 patients who conducted painless endoscopic diagnosis from February 2014 to October 2014 of our hospital were selected as objects.Patients were divided into two groups according to different nursing mode,and each group was 40 cases. Patients in control group were given routine nursing,and patients in study group were given clinical nursing pathway on the basis of control group.Vital signs liked systolic pressure and heart rate, patient care satisfaction,occurrence situation of adverse effects and fall rate in two groups before and after treatment were detected and accounted,and the results were analyzed and compared.Results Before treatment,the difference of systolic pressure and heart rate between two groups were not obvious,and the difference had no statistical significance (P0.05);the heart rate is unchanged (P0.05).After treatment,the systolic pressure and heart rate in study group had obvious difference compared with control group (P0.05).The total care satisfaction in study group,obvious higher than that was in control group,and the difference was statistical significance (P0.05).The total incidence rate of adverse effects and fall rate in study group were respectively 7.5% and 2.5%,which had significant difference com

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档