介入化疗栓塞联合腹部热疗治疗晚期胃癌近远期疗效探讨.docVIP

介入化疗栓塞联合腹部热疗治疗晚期胃癌近远期疗效探讨.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
介入化疗栓塞联合腹部热疗治疗晚期胃癌近远期疗效探讨

介入化疗栓塞联合腹部热疗治疗晚期胃癌的近远期疗效探讨   [摘要]目的 探讨介入化疗栓塞联合腹部热疗治疗晚期胃癌的近远期疗效。方法 选取该院收治的129例晚期胃癌患者为研究对象,根据其意愿分成A、B、C3组,A、B组均予以介入化疗栓塞方案,其中A组同时联合腹部热疗;C组则采用紫杉醇+顺铂化疗方案。行为期3年随访,比对3组患者近、远期疗效及生存率,分析其不良反应发生情况,记录其生活质量评估差异。结果 A组近远期疗效及生活质量评估结果为3组最佳,其次为B组,C组最差(P0.05),但均优于C组(P0.05)。结论 对晚期胃癌患者予以介入化疗栓塞联合腹部热疗方案,近远期治疗效果均较为理想,不良反应较低,利于提高患者生存率及生存质量,值得临床推广。   [关键词]介入化疗栓塞;腹部热疗;晚期;胃癌   [中图分类号]R59 [文献标识码]A [文章编号]1674-0742(2015)04(b)-0044-02   Observation on Short-term and Long-term Therapeutic Effects of Interventional Chemotherapy and Embolization Combined with Abdominal Thermotherapy in the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer   JIANG Ming GAO Xiaopan LU Xiao LAI Fengyong   Interventional Department, Henan Province Anyang tumor hospital, Anyang, Henan Province, 455000 China   [Abstract] Objective To investigate the recent and long-term efficacy of interventional chemotherapy and embolization combined with abdominal thermotherapy in treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Methods 129 cases of advanced gastric cancer patients were selected as the subjects, according to its intention were divided into group A, group B, group C three groups, group A, group B were treated with interventional chemotherapy and embolization scheme, in which group A at the same time combined with abdominal thermotherapy; group C were treated with paclitaxel + cisplatin chemotherapy. Followed-up 3 year, compared behavior, near, long-term effect and survival rate in the three groups, analysis of toxic side reaction patients, recorded differences of evaluation of life quality. Results The short and long-term curative effect and quality of life assessment results in group A was the best of three groups, followed by group B, group C was the worst (P0.05), and were better than group C(P0.05). Conclusion Interventional chemoembolization combined with abdominal thermotherapy scheme on patients with advanced gastric cancer, the therapeutic effects is more ideal, toxicity is lower, can improve the survival rate and survival qualit

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档