- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
优质护理服务对胸外科恶性肿瘤患者影响
优质护理服务对胸外科恶性肿瘤患者的影响
[摘要] 目的 探讨优质护理服务对胸外科恶性肿瘤患者的影响。方法 整群选取该院胸外科2012年1月―2014年2月收治的65例恶性肿瘤患者为研究对象,随机将其分为两组,对照组患者采取常规护理,观察组患者在对照组基础上行优质护理干预,比较两组患者干预前后SAS评分(焦虑自评量表)、SDS评分(抑郁自评量表)、生活质量及护理满意度评分。结果 两组干预后SAS评分[(42.6±2.5)VS(51.4±3.0)]分、SDS评分[(42.0±2.6)VS(51.2±3.4)]分、生活质量评分[(88.2±8.6)VS(75.5±9.4)]分、护理满意度评分[(92.6±6.7)VS(85.2±5.0)]分比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 优质护理服务能明显缓解胸外科恶性肿瘤患者焦虑、抑郁情绪,提高护理满意度,改善患者生活质量,值得临床推广。
[关键词] 优质护理服务;胸外科;恶性肿瘤;影响
[中图分类号] R4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2015)05(a)-0152-03
Effect of High Quality Nursing Service on Patients with Malignant Tumor in Department of Thoracic Surgery
CAI Sa
The Second Department of General Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanyang Medical College, Nanyang, Henan Province, 473000 China
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of high quality nursing service on patients with malignant tumor in Department of Thoracic Surgery. Methods 65 patients with malignant tumor admitted in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of our hospital from January 2012 to February 2014 were selected as the subjects and randomly divided into two groups, the control group and the observation group. The control group were given the usual care, while the observation group were given the high quality nursing intervention based on the usual care. The scores of Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS), quality of life and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups before and after intervention. Results After intervention, compared with the control group, the observation group had much lower SAS scores [(42.6±2.5) VS (51.4±3.0)], obviously lower SDS scores [(42.0±2.6) VS (51.2±3.4)], much higher quality of life scores [(88.2±8.6) VS (75.5±9.4)], significantly higher nursing satisfaction scores [(92.6±6.7) VS (85.2±5.0)], the differences in the above indexes between the two groups were statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion The high quality nursing service can significantly relieve the
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 2022甲状腺癌加速康复外科围术期护理专家共识(完整版).pdf VIP
- 二次根式及其性质.pdf VIP
- 2025年安徽省中职学校对口升学语文冲刺模拟试卷十三(教师评讲专用卷2025.pdf VIP
- 西安建筑科技大学2022-2023学年《会计学》期末考试试卷(B卷)附标准答案.docx
- 赣19ZJ132 HY石墨复合保温板外墙外保温建筑构造.docx VIP
- 北京化工大学2022-2023学年《数据结构》期末考试试卷(A卷)附参考答案.docx
- 海洋石油941技术规格书ju-2000.pdf VIP
- 新人教版新教材高中生物五册全部重点知识点归纳总结复习(高考必背).pdf
- 水污染控制课程设计某城市日处理16万m3污水处理厂工艺设计.docx VIP
- 容易时期和困难时期的通风网络和系统图.pdf VIP
原创力文档


文档评论(0)