- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
内镜黏膜下剥离术与外科手术治疗早期胃癌疗效对比研究
内镜黏膜下剥离术与外科手术治疗早期胃癌疗效对比研究
[摘要] 目的 探讨比较内镜黏膜下剥离术与外科手术治疗早期胃癌的临床疗效。方法 该研究所有患者均为方便选取2015年3月―2017年3月期间该院及外院收治的早期胃癌患者,共50例。依据患者治疗方式将50例患者分为内镜组与外科组,其中内镜组患者共35例,采用内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗,外科组患者共15例,采用外科手术治疗,对两组患者的临床疗效、手术时间、住院时间进行比较分析。结果 内镜组患者治疗有效率94.29%显著高于外科组患者治疗有效率66.67%,数据比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05);内镜组患者手术时间(88.75±20.12)min低于对照组(196.57±50.06)min,住院时间(10.21±2.26)d低于对照组(21.06±6.53)d,数据比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 与外科手术治疗相比,内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗效果更好,且手术时间短,患者术后恢复速度快,值得在临床上推广应用。
[关键词] 内镜黏膜下剥离术;外科手术;早期胃癌
[中图分类号] R735.2 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)05(c)-0090-03
[Abstract] Objective To discuss and compare the clinical curative effect of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgical surgery in treatment of early gastric cancer. Methods 50 cases of patients with early gastric cancer treated in our hospital from March 2015 to March 2017 were convenient selected and divided into two groups according to the treatment method, the endoscopic group with 35 cases adopted the endoscopic submucosal dissection, while the surgical group with 15 cases adopted the surgical survey, and the clinical curative effect, operation time and length of stay were compared between the two groups. Results The treatment effective rate in the endoscopic group was obviously higher than that in the surgical group, (94.29% vs 66.67%), and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05), and the operation time and length of stay in the endoscopic group were lower than those in the control group[(88.75±20.12)min,(10.21±2.26)d vs (196.57±50.06)min,(21.06±6.53)d], and the differences between groups were statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion The treatment effect of endoscopic submucosal dissection is better than that of surgical surgery with short operative time and rapid recovery speed after operation, and it is worth clinical promotion and application.
[Key words] Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Surgical surgery; Early gastric cancer
?魍巢捎猛饪剖质踔瘟圃缙谖赴┧淙欢愿纳苹颊咧⒆淳哂幸欢ǖ男Ч?,但也存在明显的弊端,而内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗具有微创治疗的优势,利于患者术后恢复[1]。该研究对内镜黏膜下剥离术
文档评论(0)