创伤分级诊断方法在骨创伤急救治疗中应用效果.docVIP

创伤分级诊断方法在骨创伤急救治疗中应用效果.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
创伤分级诊断方法在骨创伤急救治疗中应用效果

创伤分级诊断方法在骨创伤急救治疗中应用效果   [摘要] 目的 观察骨创伤急救的方法与效果。 方法 选择2014年1月~2016年1月至我院进行骨创伤急诊治疗患者231例进行临床研究。根据来诊时间排序,序列号为单号患者作为观察组,共计116例,序列号为双号患者作为对照组,共计115例。对照组:根据患者病史、临床症状以及体征进行常规诊断和急救处理。观察组:采用创伤分级诊断方法进行急救诊断处理。观察两组患者确定诊断率、急救成功率、转运成功率以及死亡率,比较两组患者收入科室后或者进入ICU病房后2 h的死亡率。 结果 观察组患者的确定诊断率、急救成功率、转运成功率均明显高于对照组,且差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组患者转入病房或ICU后2 h死亡率和总死亡率分别为0.86%、5.17%,均明显低于对照组6.96%、14.78%,且差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 对骨创伤急诊患者采用创伤分级诊断方法进行急救诊断和处理,能够明显提高急救的效率,增加急救的成功率,降低患者的死亡率,具有良好的临床应用前景。   [关键词] 骨创伤;急救;方法;分级诊断   [中图分类号] R459.7 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2017)17-0070-03   [Abstract] Objective To observe the method and effect of bone trauma first aid. Methods A total of 231 patients with bone traumatic emergency treatment in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2016 were enrolled. According to the timing of the visit, the patients with single number of serial number were chosen as the observation group(n=116), and the patients with double number of serial number were treated as control group(n=115). The control group was given routine diagnosis and first aid treatment according to the patient history, clinical symptoms and signs. The observation group was given emergency diagnosis by use of trauma grading diagnostic method. The confirmed diagnosis rate, emergency success rate, transport success rate and mortality of the two groups were observed. The mortality rate between the two groups was compared within 2 h after admission to department or the ICU ward. Results The confirmed diagnosis rate, emergency success rate, transport success rate were significantly higher in the observation group than those in the control group, and the difference was significant(P0.05). The mortality rate within 2 h after admission to department or the ICU ward and the total mortality rate in the observation group was 0.86% and 5.17%, respectively, significantly lower than those in the control group(6.96% and 14.78%, respectively), and there was significant difference(P0.05). Conclusion The trauma grading diag

文档评论(0)

317960162 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档