回信草稿毕业论文.doc

  1. 1、本文档共7页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Dear editor, We have substantially revised our manuscript after reading the comments by the two reviewers. The structure of the paper was adjusted accordingly after we rewrote the abstract and the introduction. The data of experiments were also expanded in the current version for reviewers’ suggestion. And here we did not list the changes because few sentences were kept originally. The new version is submitted. We appreciate your considerate suggestion and earnest comments. We hope that the correction and adjustment could meet the requirement. Best regard and wishes. Answer to reviewers: Reviewer #1: 1 It is strongly recommended that this manuscript needs to be written in a more formally manner and using grammatically correct sentences. Answer: We are sorry for our negligence of grammar errors. All the sentences were checked and we tried our best to minimize the incorrect phrases. 2 The author needs to make clear statements of their research objectives and the introductory should emphasize more on their studys objectives. Answer: According to the comments, the object have been emphasized in the sections of abstract and introduction. 3 The author might also consider describing/comparing methods/observations used in previous studies. By doing so, it would give the readers a better picture of their current developed method. Answer: The related previous studies about OPA, OSA and OMA were added in the introduction section. 4 The authors need to reconsider re-arranging sections and sub-sections of this manuscript. Sections 2.0 (In situ observing system) and 3.0 (Digital Inline Holography system) could be merged as sub-sections of section 4.0 (Materials methods). Findings of the method/study should be reorganized and merged into Results and discussion sections. Overall, this manuscript may be acceptable after major revisions. Answer: The structure have been adjusted accordingly. 5 Specific comments: Page 4, Lines 74-76: The authors should rephrase these lines a

文档评论(0)

a13355589 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档