“协助抓捕”行为的司法认定分析-刑法学专业论文.docxVIP

硕 士 学 位 论 文 “协助抓捕”行为的司法认定研究 The Study on the Judicial Determination of Assistance to Seize 作 者 姓 名： 张 豪 指 导 教 师： 陈 世 伟 副教授 西 南 政 法 大 学 Southwest University of Political Science and Law 内容 内容摘要 1 1 我国1997年刑法第68条明确规定了立功，将其作为了独立的量刑制度。1998年最高 人民法院《关于处理自首和立功具体应用法律若干问题的解释》(以下简称《解释》)第5 条随即对立功的表现形式进行了细化：犯罪分子到案后有检举、揭发他人犯罪行为，包 括共同犯罪案件中的犯罪分子揭发同案犯共同犯罪以外的其他犯罪，经查证属实；提供 侦破其他案件的重要线索，经查证属实；阻止他人犯罪活动；协助司法机关抓捕其他犯 罪嫌疑人（包括同案犯）；具有其他有利于国家和社会的突出表现的，应当认定为有立 功表现。根据《解释》规定，“协助抓捕”行为也构成立功。但是，在长期的司法实践生 涯中，笔者发现司法实务工作者对量刑制度的关注不够，尤其是对协助抓捕行为是否成 立立功的标准问题上把握不准，严重影响了司法的统一性。因此，廓清协助抓捕的内涵， 提出协助抓捕行为的认定标准，有助于合理解决这一微观问题。有鉴于此，本文从司法 实践的真实案例入手，着力探讨“协助抓捕”涵义，并从立功制度的本质及价值取向等角 度对“协助抓捕”行为进行了深层次的解读，力争使司法实务工作者对协助抓捕行为的认 定标准达成共识。 关键词：立功；协助；抓捕；功利；公正 Abstr Abstract 1 1 Meritorious Performance, stipulated in Article 68 of Criminal Law 1997, was deemed as an independent sentencing system in China, it was further specified by Article5 of the Explanation on Several Issues of law Application concerning Voluntary Surrender and Meritorious Performance which was enacted by Supreme People’s Court in 1998. It provided that any criminal who performs such actions as exposing an offence committed by another, which is verified through investigation, or producing important clues for solving other cases, or prevents other people’s criminal activity, which is verified through investigation, or assists the judicial organ to seize other criminal suspect (including accomplice), or conducts any performance beneficial to the nation or the society should be regarded as performing meritorious services. However, through a long-time judicial practice ，the author has discovered that judicial professionals have not paid sufficient focus to the sentencing system, especially the standard of whether the assistance to seize other criminal suspects should be deemed as Meritorious Performance, this is jeopardizing china’s judicial unification. Therefore, through case study this article discusses the meaning of assistance to seize other criminal suspect