珠三角地区乡村治理效能差异研究——基于a村和b村的比较-a study on the differences of rural governance efficiency in pearl river delta region —— based on the comparison between village a and village b.docxVIP

万方数据 万方数据 万方数据 万方数据 摘要 地方政府治理效能是当前我国地方行政改革中的一个重要课题,地方政府治理效能的 高低影响改革的整体推进以及民众对于政府的整体满意度以及社会的和谐和人民的幸福 感,而基层乡村治理效能则是地方政府治理效能中的一个重要部分和基础,改进和提升乡 村治理效能对于地方政府治理效能的提高有重要意义。 为推动乡村治理效能的提高，本文分别选取了位于广州市和东莞市的两个边界上的基 层村庄为研究对象。本文的研究对象 A 村和 B 村在地理位置上紧密相邻，只有一个治安亭 作为一个地理分界，两村的人口结构、经济结构基本相似，但是治理效能却大不一样，本 文对两村的治理现状和治理方式进行了详细介绍，通过访谈法和问卷调查方法对两村的治 理效能进行了对比，通过善治理论和社会资本理论对两村治理效能差异的原因进行分析， 笔者认为，两村治理效能之所以存在差异是服务意识的不一样、管理者缺乏法治意识、社 会资本在两村存在差异等因素造成的。针对存在的问题笔者认为要提高乡村治理效能应该 以依法治国思想为核心，以善治理论为指导，治理者要以民众福祉为依归，以服务型治理 方式去服务群众，摒除官僚主义，同时要注重社会资本的培育，增强公民对治理主体的信 任度和对基层治理的参与度，各方共同互动参与社会治理，促进乡村治理效能的提高。 关键词：人口倒挂；治理效能；乡村；珠三角地区 I Abstract The countryside efficiency of local government is an important subject of the current local administrative reform in China. The governance efficiency of local government would influence. The process of whole reformation , the overall satisfaction of people, the harmony of society and happiness of people, However, the grassroots governance efficiency is an important part of local governance effectiveness, improve and upgrade grassroots governance efficiency has important significance for local governance efficiency. To promote the improvement of grassroots governance effectiveness, it selects the two villages which located the boundary of Guangzhou and Dongguan as a research object in this thesis. In this thesis, the research object of village A and village B, there are in the closely geography only separated by a security booth. Both the population structure and economic structure are similar, but the governance efficiency is totally different. In this paper, the two village management status and management mode are introduced in detail, through interviews and questionnaires method compares the governance efficiency of two villages, through good governance theory and social capital theory analyze the reason for the difference between the two village governance efficiency. The author thinks that, the two village governance efficiency exist difference is different, managers lack