快速外科康复理念在腹腔镜子宫次全切除术中运用.docVIP

快速外科康复理念在腹腔镜子宫次全切除术中运用.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
快速外科康复理念在腹腔镜子宫次全切除术中运用

快速外科康复理念在腹腔镜子宫次全切除术中运用   [摘要] 目的 研究在腹腔镜子宫次全切除术中运用快速外科康复理念的安全性和可行性。方法 选择2011年3月―2013年2月期间于该院行腹腔镜子宫次全切除术患者398例,分别采用FTS理念和传统处理原则管理围手术期,比较两组患者术后住院时间、住院费用、恶心呕吐、术后进食时间、术后肛门排气时间、术后并发症的发生率等。 结果 研究组患者住院天数为(4.0±1.2) d,对照组为(6.7±1.3) d,研究组住院费用为(5684.4±213.7),对照组为(6 754.6±179.9),研究组术后进食时间(6.0±0.9) h,对照组为(9.4±2.6) h;研究组术后肛门排气时间为(14.5±3.8) h,对照组为(22.3±3.3) h;研究组和对照组术后并发症均为0例,研究组较传统组住院时间短,住院费用低,术后进食时间、术后肛门排气时间明显提前,术后并发症少,康复快,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 将快速外科康复理念应用在腹腔镜子宫次全切除术患者的围手术期处理,有利于患者快速康复。   [关键词] 快速康复外科;子宫次全切除术;腹腔镜   [中图分类号] R63 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2014)06(b)-0047-02   [Abstract] Objective To study the feasibility and safety of fast track surgery in patients with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Methods 398 patients undergoing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy in our hospital from March, 2011 to February, 2013 were selected and treated with FTS concept and conventional treatment principles during the perioperative period, respectively. The postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, postoperative nausea and vomiting, the time of restoration of taking food after operation, postoperative anal exhaust time and incidence of complications of two groups of patients were compared. Results The length of stay of the study group was (4.0±1.2)d, and that of the control group was (6.7±1.3)d; the hospitalization expense of the study group was 5684.4±213.7, and that of the control group was 6754.6±179.9; the time of restoration of taking food after operation of the study group was (6.0±0.9)h, and that of the control group was (9.4±2.6)h; postoperative anal exhaust time of the study group was (14.5±3.8)h, and that of the control group was 22.3±3.3h;both the study group and the control group had 0 case with complications; compared with the conventional group, the study groups length of stay was shorter, hospitalization expense was lower, the time of restoration of taking food after operation and postoperative anal exhaust time was much earlier, the postoperative c

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档