无创镇痛分娩在产科临床应用中护理干预.docVIP

无创镇痛分娩在产科临床应用中护理干预 　　[摘要]目的 探讨凡乐生无创镇痛分娩在产科临床观察及治疗效果。方法 ?x取2012年9月1日～2016年10月30日我院产科收治的60例分娩产妇，按照分娩镇痛方式不同，分为传统组（30例）与无创组（30例），观察产妇机体疼痛情况与总产程用时，记录产妇对于临床护理服务治疗评分情况。结果 传统组产妇疼痛度缓解度一般，无创组缓解较好（P0.01）。传统组总产程用时多于无创组（P0.01）。传统组患者疼痛缓解、情绪安抚、沟通、生产知识宣教及体征观察等指标评分均低于无创组（P0.01）。结论 采用凡乐生仪器进行产程干预，可以缓解自然分娩时产妇的机体疼痛，价格不高，无副作用，值得在临床广泛推广应用。 　　[关键词]无创镇痛分娩；产科；凡乐生仪 　　[中图分类号] R714.3 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721（2016）12（a）-0089-03 　　Noninvasive analgesia childbirth in obstetric intervention in clinical application 　　ZHONG Qiao-mei SU Yin-qing YE Xiao-qin 　　Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology，People′s Hospital of Yuancheng District of Heyuan City in Guangdong Province，Heyuan 517000，China 　　[Abstract]Objective To observe the clinical effect of non-invasive anodyne labor with Finecure instrument in the obstetrical department.Methods 60 puerpera were delivered from September 1，2012 to October 30，2016 in obstetrical department of our hospital were selected.The subjects were divided into conventional group and non-invasive group according to the anodyne labor methods，30 cases in each group.The pain degree and total stage of labor as well as their evaluation score on the nursing care was observed.Results The remission rate of labor pain for non-invasive group was better than that of conventional group （P0.01）；the total stage of labor for conventional group was longer than that of non-invasive group （P0.01）；the evaluation score of pain remission，calming of emotions，communication，education of related knowledge and signs of the conventional group was lower than that of non-invasive group （P0.01）.Conclusion Finecure instrument is introduced to relieve the labor pain.In addition，its treatment cost is reasonable，without adverse reactions.It is worthy of extensive promotion 　　一定风险，产妇在经历此阶段时会出现较为复杂的心理活动，会担忧生产时疼痛、对自身角色转变没有做好准备、担忧分娩方式及产后结果等[1]。而随着现代临床技术不断发展，产科针对生产时疼痛也提出较多缓解方法，如药物镇痛等，但药物镇痛会对产妇机体造成一定刺激，可能会造成产后出现并发症情况，影响生产结局[2]。目前大部分产妇会因惧怕生产时疼痛而选择剖宫产手术，因此为了提高临床自然分娩率，我院产科引进凡乐生无创镇痛分娩法。此种技术是一种新型技术，与药物镇痛所不同