- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
腹壁横纵切口对于二次剖宫产影响
腹壁横纵切口对于二次剖宫产影响
[Abstract] Objective To approach influence of abdominal transverse incision and longitudinal incision for secondary cesarean delivery. Methods The clinical data of 1800 cases with secondary cesarean delivery admitted to Department of Obstetrics, Mianyang Peoples Hospital from January 2012 to January 2015 were analyzed, both groups were taken the original old incision surgery, and they were divided into two groups by primary cesarean delivery way, with 900 cases in abdominal transverse incision group and 900 cases in abdominal longitudinal incision. The fetal childbirth time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss of two groups were observed; the maternal pelvic adhesion, abdominal incision healing of two groups were compared; the neonatal score and family satisfaction of two groups were analyzed. Results The fetal childbirth time [(8.4±2.0) min], operation time [(34.3±4.5) min], intraoperative blood loss [(233.8±15.6) mL] of abdominal longitudinal incision group were lower than those of abdominal transverse incision group [(12.5±4.4) min, (39.0±6.0) min, (254.8±21.1) mL], the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05), the family satisfaction (95%) of abdominal longitudinal incision group was higher than that of abdominal transverse incision group (70%), the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). Conclusion The secondary cesarean delivery operation after operation by longitudinal incision has high efficiency, less complications, which is helpful for the recovery of puerpera.
[Key words] Abdominal transverse incision; Abdominal longitudinal incision; Secondary cesarean delivery; Influence
随着医疗技术的不断发展,分娩方式也逐渐增多,剖宫产在临床得到了广泛的应用。其可以替代以往比较困难的阴道助产术,在一定程度上降低新生儿和产妇的死亡比例,成为进行高危妊娠、难产的主要方法[1-2]。随着我国二孩政策的逐渐放开,二次剖宫产比例明显增多,手术切口对于二次剖宫产影响的研究也相应增加。有资料显示[3-4],因不同因素的影响,促使瘢痕子宫、胎盘粘连、前置胎盘、子宫破裂等风险性事件明显升高。在二次怀孕分娩时子宫破裂发生率增高,因而研究不同手术切口对于二次剖宫产影响显得尤为重要。本研究通过对二次剖宫产产妇的临床资料进行分析,拟探讨腹壁横纵切口对于二次剖宫产的影响,现将结果报道如下:
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
选取2012年1月~201
文档评论(0)