腹腔镜下输卵管壶腹部妊娠切开取胚术中输卵管创面不同止血方法疗效比较.docVIP

腹腔镜下输卵管壶腹部妊娠切开取胚术中输卵管创面不同止血方法疗效比较 　　【摘要】 目的 研究腹腔镜下输卵管壶腹部妊娠切开取胚术中输卵管创面出血点电凝止血与缝合止血的近期、远期疗效， 以期为腹腔镜下行输卵管壶腹部妊娠切开取胚术中输卵管创面出血的处理提供依据。方法 96例输卵管壶腹部妊娠患者， 随机分为观察组和对照组， 各48例。两组患者均接受腹腔镜下输卵管壶腹部妊娠切开取胚术， 观察组输卵管创面出血部位予4/0 Vicryl可吸收缝线缝合止血， 对照组输卵管创面出血部位予双极电凝止血， ?^察比较两组患者治疗效果。结果 观察组手术时间长于对照组， 术中出血量多于对照组， 差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）。观察组患者术后患侧输卵管通畅率为100.00%， 明显高于对照组的91.67%， 差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）。两组患侧输卵管通畅患者于输卵管造影后随访1年， 观察组宫内自然妊娠率高于对照组， 再次异位妊娠率低于对照组， 差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论 腹腔镜下输卵管壶腹部妊娠切开取胚术中输卵管创面出血点使用可吸收缝线缝合止血， 可有效提高术后患侧输卵管通畅率和自然妊娠率， 但较电凝止血耗时稍长、术中出血稍多。 　　【关键词】 输卵管壶腹部妊娠；腹腔镜；电凝止血；缝合止血 　　DOI：10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2018.10.003 　　【Abstract】 Objective To study the short-term and long-term efficacy of electrocoagulation hemostasis and suture hemostasis on the oviduct wound during laparoscopic tubal ampullary pregnancy incision and embryo extraction， so as to provide basis for processing for oviduct wound bleeding during laparoscopic tubal ampullary pregnancy incision and embryo extraction. Methods A total of 96 tubal ampullary pregnancy patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group， with 48 cases in each group. Both groups received laparoscopic tubal ampullary pregnancy incision and embryo extraction， and the observation group received 4/0 Vicryl absorbable suture for hemostasis of oviduct wound bleeding site， and the control group received bipolar electrocoagulation for hemostasis for hemostasis of oviduct wound bleeding site. The treatment effect in two groups was observed and compared between the two groups. Results The observation group had longer operation time than the control group， and more intraoperative bleeding volume than the control group， and the difference was statistically significant （P0.05）. The observation group had obviously higher patency rate of affected oviduct after operation as 100.00% than 91.67% in the control group， and the difference was statistically significant （P 　　【Key words】 Tubal ampullary pregnancy； Laparoscope； Electrocoagulation hemostasis；