血管内介入治疗前循环急性脑梗死预后分析.docVIP

血管内介入治疗前循环急性脑梗死预后分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
血管内介入治疗前循环急性脑梗死预后分析

血管内介入治疗前循环急性脑梗死预后分析   【摘要】 目的:探讨单纯静脉溶栓、单纯机械再通与静脉溶栓联合机械再通治疗前循环急性脑梗死的临床效果及安全性。方法:选择急性前循环脑梗死患者94例,根据治疗方式的不同分为静脉溶栓组(n=41),机械再通组(n=28)与联合溶栓组(n=25);静脉溶栓组采用单纯静脉溶栓治疗,机械再通组采用单纯机械再通治疗,联合溶栓组采用静脉溶栓?合机械再通治疗。根据预后良好率、死亡率、血管再闭塞率及患者并发症发生情况比较三种方式的实际临床效果。结果:静脉溶栓组患者溶栓14 d后NIHSS评分比溶栓治疗前低,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:静脉溶栓对技术要求较低,机械再通起效较快,血管再闭塞率低,联合治疗起效快,预后良好率高。   【关键词】 静脉溶栓; 前循环; 脑梗死; 介入治疗; 预后分析   Prognostic Analysis of Intravascular Interventional Therapy for Anterior Circulation of Acute Cerebral Infarction/LIANG Yu-hang,TANG Long-chong,FANG Hai-bo.//Medical Innovation of China,2017,14(11):034-037   【Abstract】 Objective:To explore the clinical effect and safety of intravenous thrombolysis,mechanical thrombolysis and intravenous thrombolysis combined with mechanical thrombolysis in the treatment of anterior circulation acute cerebral infarction.Method:A total of 94 cases of acute anterior circulation cerebral infarction were selected and divided into intravenous thrombolysis group (n=41),mechanical recanalization group (n=28) and combined thrombolysis group (n=25) according to the different treatment methods.Intravenous thrombolysis group was treated by intravenous thrombolysis.Mechanical recanalization group was treated by mechanical recanalization.The combination of thrombolysis and mechanical recanalization was used incombined thrombolysis group.According to good prognosis,mortality,Vascular Re occlusion rate and the incidence of complications,the actual clinical effects of three groups were compared.Result:After thrombolysis,the scores of NIHSS were lower than those before thrombolytic therapy(P0.05).Conclusion:Intravenous thrombolysis has lower technical requirement,mechanical thrombolysis has rapider onset and lower re-occlusion rate,combined therapy has rapider onset and good prognosis.   【Key words】 Intravenous thrombolysis; Anterior circulation; Cerebral infarction; Interventional therapy; Prognosis analysis   First-author’s address:Central People’s Hospital of Zhanjiang,Zhanjiang

文档评论(0)

317960162 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档