比较逻辑分析-马克思主义理论专业论文.docxVIP

I I 比较逻辑研究 摘 要 本论文是将古代中国、印度、希腊这三大逻辑体系之对比分析研究内容纳入 一独立学科体系进行研究，初步提出比较逻辑研究的三个阶段，明确提出了比较 逻辑范畴、价值和方法论，试图为构建一门独立学科——比较逻辑学，作一探索 研究尝试，这在国内外逻辑史上是一项史无前例的工作。因此，本论文课题具有 重大的理论价值和开创性意义。通过将三支逻辑源流纳入比较逻辑学科体系进行 研究，能让我们更好地认识先秦墨家辩学之精髓，弘扬中华民族的优秀传统文化， 促进三支逻辑源流在比较文化语境下的平等对话与交流，推进不同文化、不同思 维方式之间的对话与沟通，为繁荣人类思维科学做出新的贡献，以促进不同逻辑 理论、观点的和谐共处。在此意义上，本论文同样具有重要的实用价值。随着经 济全球化日新月异的发展，比较文化备受瞩目，在逻辑学学科发展中，比较逻辑 学日见重要。建构比较逻辑学的完整学科体系已经成为逻辑学业内一项重要的期 待，因此，在原有局部性比较研究之基础上，建立一门“比较逻辑学”的系统学 说，虽是筚路蓝缕之事，但可以弥补逻辑学此方面研究之不足，进而探索一条逻 辑学研究新路。这正是本论文目的所在。本文从比较逻辑研究的前两个阶段入手， 从本体论和认识论角度分析、论证了建立比较逻辑学学科体系的重要性，并作了 比较逻辑研究尝试。 关键词：比较逻辑学 西方逻辑 中国名辩 印度因明 中图分类号：B81 II II The Study of Comparative Logic Abstract This study intends to make the three logical origins into an independent discipline system for clarifying the more logical location, category, value and methodology, trys to build an independent discipline-Comparative Logic, which is an unprecedented task. in domestic and foreign logic history. Therefore, this study is of great theoretical value and creative significance. By Origin into the three logical comparison study subject system logic, allowing us to better understand the essence of dialectics Pre-Qin-Age Mohist, carry forward the fine traditional culture of Chinese nation, promote the three logical origins in more equal dialogue between the Cultural Context and exchanges, promote the different cultures and ways of thinking dialogue and communication , for the prosperity of the human mind to make new contributions to science and to promote the harmonious coexistence of mankind. So to some extent, this thesis also has important practical value. With the rapid globalization process, logic has become increasingly more important, how to construct a more complete system of logic has become an important academic expectations, therefore, comparative study of the original localized basis, the establishment of a Comparative Logic is not only arduous, but compensates or the areas which had not been researched, and then explore a ne