- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
银杏叶提取物治疗非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变临床疗效分析
银杏叶提取物治疗非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变临床疗效分析
[摘要] 目的 研?银杏叶提取物治疗非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变的治疗效果。 方法 选择我院2014年1月~2016年1月收治的非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变患者100例,根据数字法随机将100例患者分为两组,分别予以不同方式治疗,采用丹参液治疗的50例(51眼)分为对照组,采用银杏叶提取物治疗的50例(52眼)分为研究组,比较两组临床效果。 结果 研究组治疗后视力与治疗前比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05);研究组治疗后视野有所提高,但较治疗前差异无统计学意义(P0.05),而对照组有不明显降低,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);研究组有效率与对照组相比差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 银杏叶提取物治疗非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变可使疗效得到显著提升,促进患者视力改善,值得推广。
[关键词] 非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变;银杏叶提取物;丹参液;视力;低灌注
[中图分类号] R774.6 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2018)09-0073-03
Analysis on the clinical efficacy of ginkgo biloba extract in the treatment of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
XIE Weiyi
Department of Neurological Ophthalmology, Fuzhou Southeast Eye Hospital(Jinshan Hospital), Fuzhou 350009, China
[Abstract] Objective To study the therapeutic effect of ginkgo biloba extract in the treatment of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Methods 100 cases of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy were selected. The patients were admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to January 2016. According to the digital method, 100 patients were randomly divided into two groups, and were given different treatment. 50 cases(51 eyes) who were treated with salvia miltiorrhiza were divided into control group, and 50 cases(52 eyes) who were treated with ginkgo biloba extract were divided into study group. The clinical effects were compared between the two groups. Results The visual acuity in the study group after treatment was statistically significantly different from that before treatment(P0.05); the visual field in the study group after treatment was improved, but the difference was not statistically significant compared with that before treatment(P0.05). The visual field was not significantly reduced in the control group, and the difference was not statistically significant(P0.05); the effective rate in the study group was statistically significant compared with that in the control group(P0.05). Conclusion Ginkgo bilob
原创力文档


文档评论(0)