下肢动脉硬化闭塞症介入治疗效果及其的影响因素分析.docVIP

下肢动脉硬化闭塞症介入治疗效果及其的影响因素分析 　　DOI：10.16662/j.cnki.1674-0742.2016.32.046 　　[摘要] 目的 分析下肢动脉硬化闭塞症介入治疗效果及其影响因素。方法 根据治疗方法的不同，整群选取该院2013年1月―2015年9月期间收治的76例下肢动脉硬化闭塞症患者分为观察组（介入治疗）41例和对照组（常规治疗）35例，对比两组患者的临床治疗效果，分析及其影响因素。结果 观察组患者的治疗有效率和并发症发生率均高于对照组（95.1%82.9%，9.7%2.9%），对比差异具有统计学意义（P85.2%，96.0%82.6%，91.7%76.1%），对比差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论 下肢动脉硬化闭塞症介入治疗效果显著，而高龄和疾病史等因素增加了治疗风险，需要采取有效的治疗干预措施予以控制，以促进患者的治疗和恢复。 　　[关键词] 下肢动脉硬化闭塞症；介入治疗；影响因素 　　[中图分类号] R5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742（2016）11（b）-0046-03 　　Interventional Treatment of Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusive Disease and Analysis of its Influencing Factors 　　ZHANG Hai-long 　　The Cardiovascular Department of General Hospital of Heilongjiang Land Reclamation Bureau， Harbin， Heilongjiang Province ， 1500881 China 　　[Abstract] Objective To analyze the effect and influencing factors of interventional treatment for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease. Methods Group selection according to the different treatment methods， treated in our hospital in January 2013 to September 2015， 76 cases of lower extremity arteriosclerosis occlusion patients divided into observation group （intervention） in 41 cases and the control group （conventional therapy）， 35 cases， compared two groups of patients with clinical therapeutic effect， analysis and its influencing factors.Results The effective rate and incidence of complications in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group （82.9% 9.7%， 2.9% 95.7%）， and the comparison was statistically significant （P 85.2% and 96.0% 82.6% and 91.7% 76.1%）， difference has statistical significance （P 0.05）. Conclusion Interventional treatment of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease is significant， and the elderly and disease history and other factors increase the risk of treatment， the need to take effective treatment interventions to control， to promote the patients treatment and recovery. 　　[Key words] Lower extremity arterial occlusive disease； Interventional therapy；