IRAC例分析方法.docxVIP

The Sections of an IRAC [ HYPERLINK /w/index.php?title=IRACaction=editsection=2 \o Edit section: Issue edit] Issue The IRAC starts with a statement of the issue or question at hand. In the issue section of an IRAC it is important to state exactly what the HYPERLINK /wiki/Question_of_law \o Question of law question of law is. [ HYPERLINK /w/index.php?title=IRACaction=editsection=3 \o Edit section: Rules edit] Rules The rules section of an IRAC follows the statement of the issue at hand. The rule section of an IRAC is the statement of the rules pertinent in deciding the issue stated. Rules in a HYPERLINK /wiki/Common_law \o Common law common law jurisdiction derive from court case HYPERLINK /wiki/Precedent \o Precedent precedent and HYPERLINK /wiki/Statute \o Statute statute. The information included in the rules section depends heavily on the specificity of the question at hand. If the question states a specific HYPERLINK /wiki/Jurisdiction \o Jurisdiction jurisdiction then it is proper to include rules specific to that jurisdiction. Another distinction often made in the rule section is a clear delineation of rules that are in HYPERLINK /wiki/Holding \o Holding holding and rules that are HYPERLINK /wiki/Obiter_dicta \o Obiter dicta obiter dicta. This helps make a correct legal analysis of the issue at hand. The rules section needs to be a legal summary of all the rules used in the analysis and is often written in a manner which paraphrases or otherwise analytically condenses information into applicable rules. [ HYPERLINK /w/index.php?title=IRACaction=editsection=4 \o Edit section: Application/Analysis edit] Application/Analysis The application / analysis section of an IRAC applies the rules developed in the rules section to the specific facts of the issue at hand. This section uses only the rules stated in the rules section of the IRAC and usually utilizes all the rules stated including exceptions as is required by the analysis. It is important in this section