《列子》考辨与思想的-研究.pdf

Abstract Abstract Thebook bookitselftocable lieh-tzu，argumentation child，the writing，SuChen deep，the authoralso havealso sinceMaXuLunthe to afterthe question complexperson long deposit books fakebooks likeitsauthorshave releaseof”testfake lieh-tzu，the identity,and undoubtedly or．Sincethenthe hasbeencountedasnotesmorethanthosebetweenweiHaoShiZhiTu theory bookWaSabandonedtheacademicof andthoseofits by historyphilosophy history,arespectful its bookaboutfalseand alliswordona and reason,its distance，not whatever,investigate deposit timethen can theend．The bookis trueandfalseaffiliated original unknown,both uncertain，age to neither andculturalstatus onallinconvenience．Relative decide，itsideological and．evaluation lieh-tzuachievementsandbook isnot and the value，thepresentstudy enough，thesuperiority its academiavaluethe dontmatch oflieh-tzuon snubbingapparently up． meaning present deep，its Thebooklieh-tzuinvolvefrom to ofacademic may every problems， jin pre-qindays aspect