- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
P合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者经BiPAP呼吸机治疗的临床效果.doc
COPD合并II型呼吸衰竭患者经BiPAP呼吸机治疗的临床效果
】H的:探讨慢性阻塞性肺病合并II型呼吸衰竭患者应用 BiPAP呼吸机治疗临床价值。方法:择取笔者所在医院在2014年1月 -2015年6月收治的⑶PD合并II型呼吸衰竭70例患者进行临床研究, 按数字奇偶法分为两组,对照组34例给予常规治疗,研究组36例在 对照组基础上应用BiPAP呼吸机治疗;观察两组患者治疗前后肺功能、 动脉血气分析指标及SGRQ评价情况。结果:研究组患者治疗后活动影 响、临床症状及疾病影响等SGRQ评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义
(P0. 05);两组患者治疗前动脉血气指标与肺功能指标比较,差异无 统计学意义(P0. 05),治疗后两组动脉血气指标与肺功能指标均明显 改善,差异有统计学意义(P〈0. 05),且治疗后研究组指标改善优于对 照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:对合并II型呼吸衰竭的慢 性阻塞性肺病患者应用BiPAP呼吸机治疗,可有效改善其临床症状, 纠正低氧血症,迅速缓解呼吸衰竭。
和著作权归原 所有, 匕
关键词】慢性阻塞性肺病;呼吸衰竭;BiPAP呼吸机;临床 疗效
doi:10. 14033/j. cnki. cfmr. 2017. 14. 001 A 文章编 号 1674-6805 (2017) 14-0001-03
Clinical Effect of Bi PAP Ventilator in Patients with COPD
Complicated with Type II Respiratory Failure/XU Dong-mei. //Chinese and Foreign Medical Research, 2017,15(14):
1-3
[Abstract] Objective:To discuss the clinical value of BiPAP ventilator in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
patients with type II respiratory failure. Method: 70 patients
with COPD combined with type II respiratory failure admitted in
our hospital from January 2014 to June 2015 were selected and
divided into 2 groups according to the digital parity. 34 cases
of the control group were treated with conventional therapy. 36
cases of the study group were treated with BiPAP ventilator on
the basis treatment of control group. The lung function and
arterial blood gas analysis indexes and the SGRQ (Respiratory
Questionnaire ) were evaluated before and after the
treatment. Result: Compared with the control group, the impact
of activities, clinical symptoms, disease influences of SGRQ scores in the study group were significantly lower, and the
differences were statistically significant(P〈O. 05). The indexes
of arterial blood air and pulmonary function in two groups befor
treatment had no significant difference (P0. 05) . The indexs of
pulmonary function and arterial blood in two groups after
treatment were significantly improved (P0. 05) . The indexs in
the stndy group were better than those in the control group a
原创力文档


文档评论(0)