神经电刺激治疗卒中后吞咽障碍59例临床剖析.docVIP

神经电刺激治疗卒中后吞咽障碍59例临床剖析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
神经电刺激治疗卒中后吞咽障碍59例临床剖析

神经电刺激治疗卒中后吞咽障碍59例临床剖析   [摘要] 目的 探讨Vitalstim神经电刺激治疗对脑卒中后吞咽障碍早期康复疗效。 方法 选择我院129例急性脑卒中患者,根据治疗方法不同分为研究组和对照组,对照组患者予卒中相关药物治疗及康复医师指导下吞咽训练治疗,研究组患者同时给予Vitalstim神经电刺激治疗,比较两组治疗前后吞咽功能评分及肺部感染发生率。 结果 研究组和对照组干预前后吞咽功能评分降低数值分别为(2.22±1.09)分和(1.30±0.89)分,有显著性差异(P=0.000)。研究组和对照组吞咽治疗总有效率分别为79.66%、57.14%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组患者肺部感染发生率分别为28.81%、40.00%,有显著性差异(χ2=4.074,P=0.044)。 结论 Vitalstim神经电刺激联合吞咽训练可有效改善卒中后吞咽障碍早期吞咽功能,并降低患者因吞咽障碍导致的肺部感染发生率。   [关键词] 脑卒中;Vitalstim;吞咽障碍;康复   [中图分类号] R743.3 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2017)26-0069-04   Clinical analysis of 59 cases of post-stroke dysphagia treated by electrical stimulation   WANG Weiqing LI Yun WANG Li   Department of Neurology, the First People’s Hospital of Jiande in Zhejiang Province, Jiande 311600, China   [Abstract] Objective To explore the effect of Vitalstim electric stimulation on early rehabilitation of dysphagia after stroke. Methods 129 cases of acute stroke patients were divided into study group and control group according to the treatment methods. The patients in the control group were treated with the stroke-related drug therapy and the swallowing training under the guidance of rehabilitation physician. The patients in the study group were given vitals nerve electrical stimulation treatment at the same time, and then the swallowing function score before and after intervention and the incidence of pulmonary infection were compared between both groups. Results The difference scores of swallowing function before and after intervention in the study group and control group were average(2.22±1.09) and(1.30±0.89) respectively, and there was significant difference(P=0.000). The total effective rates of the study group and the control group were 79.66% and 57.14% respectively, and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05). The incidence of pulmonary infection was 28.81% and 40.00% respectively, and the difference was statistically significant(χ2=4.074, P=0.044). Conclusion Vitalstim electrical stimulation combined with swall

文档评论(0)

erterye + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档