纯粹经济损失赔偿问题比较研究-民商法专业论文.docxVIP

II II ABSTRACT Pure economic loss refers to losses incurred by those who do not depend on the victims personal injury or material（tangible property）damage. On comparative law, their is a compensable injury is not compensable damages filter out of filter, which aims to prevent tort liability is too harsh, and behavior in order to protect the freedom and fairness, and efficiency. Pure economic loss is accompanied by a high degree of economic and social development, and can even say that it is a complex and interdependent commercial and economic interests of modern society by-product. After the 1950s, the major capitalist countries economy sustained rapid development, resulting in more and more prominent cases of pure economic loss, the concept became popular in the Tort Law of the Two countries in the 1980s. Before Chinas reform and opening up due to the many aspects of the economic system and technology, social economic and business extremely backward, the concept of pure economic loss in the concept of Law of Chinas scholars unfamiliar. Scattered in our legislation are essentially within the provisions of the pure economic loss in legal terms there is no cause for concern. However, with the establishment of market economic system, social relations, enormous opportunities of all kinds may produce pure economic loss in large numbers, in fact, the case of pure economic loss have also occurred, the theory of pure economic loss in China highlights the importance, therefore, necessary to the theory of in-depth study, analysis of Chinas legislative and judicial practice, the solution to the problem in guiding practice, and promote socio-economic and commercial progress. Pure economic loss is different from the consequential economic loss of independence; can be measured in monetary terms, with the economy; the existence of invisible, abstract; but its greatest feature is its uncertainty, including the victims of the scope and damage amount uncertainty. On comparative law,