网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

答辩失权制度若干问题研究-法律专业论文.docx

答辩失权制度若干问题研究-法律专业论文.docx

  1. 1、本文档共50页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
答辩失权制度若干问题研究-法律专业论文

青海民族大学硕士学位论文答辩失权制度 青海民族大学硕士学位论文 答辩失权制度若干问题研究 万方数据 万方数据 Research on Issues of Defense Invalidation ABSTRACT Along With the reform of our civil procedure groving into a broader field, to establish a perfect pretrial procedure has been the most important things at present. As an important part of the pretrial procedure , the value that the defendant submits his written to the court before trial is increasing everyday . Although Chinas current Code of Civil Procedure in section 132 provides that the peoples court shall, within five days from the date of filing the copy of the bill of complaint sent to the defendant, the defendant received the complaint within fifteen days from the date of a defense, but added later, the defendant did not submit a defense, does not affect the peoples court hearing, the provisions of this act no doubt to the defendant can take advantage of any defense of the machine. As the Supreme Peoples Court rules of evidence, the introduction, in section 32 provides: The defendant shall file an answer before the deadline to reply like, Here for the first time using the word should can be said that a major judicial reform progress, but still no clear answer by the defendant does not have to bear the legal consequences, leaving this provision become an empty Because of the current legislative provision for the Defense of the Accused lack of rigid constraints, the defendant presented a great deal of any defense, and is the function of pre-trial preparation procedure can not be fully reflected, but it also brings confusion rules of evidence, the court inefficient, and many other defects . In this context, shared by two legal defense for the loss of the right system has been gradually incorporated into peoples vision. However, the system loss of the right of reply of the feasibility of introducing some differences on the issue, of course, the generation of new things, disagreement is inevitable, but we can not therefore III over-cautious, afrai

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档