德占时期青岛社会治理研究-中外政治制度专业论文.docxVIP

万方数据 万方数据 Abstract As a kind of vision, subject, object and path constitutes the theoretical framework of social governance. The governor, city administration, city councils, the judiciary make up the organization, control all social affairs, carry out various social public activities in Qingdao. So, they become the leader of social governance. Under the leadership of the organization, church groups set up schools and hospitals, halls and chamber of commerce deal with relation between companies and organizations, market. They become limited participants in social governance. People are forced to accord regulations set by the organization , and cant called subjects and participants. Social public affairs is the object of social governance. Organization lead roads, sewers, water plants, power plants, post, etc . Social organizations participate in education, health care services. Organizations mobilize or force people to protect the environment, and relatively relax control running newspapers. Path exists in the activity —the subject acting on the object. Based on the above analysis, the path of German governing Qingdao: with racist for the principle, with land policy for basement, with rule for security. It reveals the imbalance between social management and social development . Key Words: Social governance; Governor; Social public affairs；Modern Qingdao; 目录 HYPERLINK \l _bookmark0 引言 .................................................................. 6 HYPERLINK \l _bookmark1 第 1 章 德占时期青岛社会治理主体分析 .................................. 13 HYPERLINK \l _bookmark2 1.1 组织机构：总督独揽大权 ........................................ 13 HYPERLINK \l _bookmark3 1.1.1 行政机构 ................................................ 13 HYPERLINK \l _bookmark4 总督高度集权 ...................................... 13 HYPERLINK \l _bookmark5 1.1.1. 2 城市管理机构 ...................................... 13 HYPERLINK \l _bookmark6 1.1.2 城市议会 ............................................... 14 HYPERLINK \l _bookm