网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

典型城市生活垃圾处置的温室气体协同减排研究-环境工程(环境科学)专业论文.docx

典型城市生活垃圾处置的温室气体协同减排研究-环境工程(环境科学)专业论文.docx

  1. 1、本文档共70页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
典型城市生活垃圾处置的温室气体协同减排研究-环境工程(环境科学)专业论文

ABSTRACT Waste-to-energy (WtE) can not only generate energy in the municipal solid waste disposal process, but also reduce greenhouse gas emission. Taking two WtE methods (incineration with energy and landfill with landfill gas utilization) as objects, this paper calculated the gas emission reductions of the two WtE methods in northern and southern cities in China. This paper researched the synergistic effect of greenhouse gas emission reduction and waste disposal, and then made cost-benefit analysis for WtE methods under per unit greenhouse gas reduction. This paper includes two parts. The first part is to analysis the appropriate WtE method for different cities by comparing the synergistic reduction effect of WtE methods between northern and southern cities in China. Such can help to provide the basis for the construction of WtE projects in different cities. The second part is to analysis the impacts of carbon trading revenue and tipping fee to the cost-effectiveness of WtE methods by comparing the costs and benefits of WtE methods between typical northern and southern cities in China. Such can help the local government develop appropriate tipping fee and other related systems. Without considering the CO2 of biogenic origin, the reductions for landfill with –1 landfill gas utilization are bigger in southern cities (905~999 kg CO2e t –1 MSW) than in northern cities (529~767 kg CO2e t MSW). And the values for incineration with –1 energy are substantially the same, 810~1092 kg CO2e t –1 MSW in northern cities and 754~1057 kg CO2e t MSW in southern cities. It deserves attention that CO2 of biogenic origin has a greater impact on the accounting results. There is relatively large potential for WtE projects in southern cities and the cost-effectiveness is very good for landfill with landfill gas utilization there. Government should give priority to supporting the southern cities to carry out WtE projects. Even without carbon trading, as tipping fees paid by local

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档