- 1、本文档共59页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
▲外科手术vye预防与治疗进展黄晓钟
/wiki/view.php?category=202group_id/link?url=2QK-obdLuB6geZjX1CWwAfn4AHIkSsT3yjlfa52UbXRpqSbq7cGbGvW5sPI0nCdnH_4bIimR2-T7epvZOP24Gq16SdI9p4K_Zh7o_ZpQtc_ * Competing Interests Declared: None. This article is part of a group of articles from the Patient Safety in Surgery Study, a demonstration project between the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American College of Surgeons in selected private-sector hospitals, funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, grant number 5U18HS011913, entitled “Reporting System to Improve Patient Safety in Surgery.” The Patient Safety in Surgery Study led to the successful formation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. This article represents the personal viewpoints of the authors and cannot be construed as a statement of official policy of the American College of Surgeons, the Department of Veterans Affairs, or the US government. * 危险 * 北京大学第一医院 * 北京大学第一医院 * 20-30 cc of blood moved each compression cycle Current methods of thromboprophylaxis * Nurmohamed et al. conducted a meta-analysis of all studies conducted between 1984 and 1991 comparing LMWH and UFH for the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing general surgery (defined as abdominothoracic or gynaecological surgery) and patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery (defined as elective or traumatic hip surgery). For each report the relative risk (RR) and the 95% confidence interval were calculated for the efficacy and safety of LMWH over UFH treatment. Major bleeding was defined as clinically overt bleeding with one or more of the following criteria: fall in haemoglobin of more than 1.2 g/L; bleeding necessitating re-operation or cessation of prophylaxis; or retroperitoneal or intracranial bleeding). In patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery there was a reduction in risk of DVT and PE in those receiving LMWH compared with those receiving UFH without an increase in
文档评论(0)