环境民事纠纷非诉讼解决机制研究-环境与资源保护法学专业论文.docxVIP

 摘要 随着社会经济的发展，环境问题日益突出，由此引发的民事纠纷也日渐 增多，能否公正高效地解决环境民事纠纷，不仅关系到公民合法权益的维护， 而且关系到社会的平稳发展。为适应解决环境民事纠纷的需要，各国除了对 诉讼制度进行改革外，还积极发展了各种非诉讼制度。我国在完善诉讼制度 的同时，也注意到非诉讼方式在解决环境民事纠纷中的作用。但我国的环境 民事纠纷非诉讼解决机制仍存在不足之处。鉴于此，本文对环境民事纠纷非 诉讼解决机制进行了探讨。 本文从环境民事纠纷的性质和特征入手，根据非诉讼解决机制(ADR) 的理论，借鉴美国、日本、韩国的环境ADR机制，对我国的环境ADR机制 进行了分析。针对我国的环境ADR机制存在的不足之处，建议从以下几个 方面进行完善：强调诉讼机制的同时，重视非诉讼解决机制的构建；完善我 国的环境纠纷行政处理制度；建立环境民事纠纷仲裁制度；赋予和解、调解 协议的法律效力。最终形成有效的环境ADR机制，以有利于社会、经济、 环境的协调发展。 关键词：环境民事纠纷非诉讼解决机制调解行政处理仲裁   ABSTRACT With social and economic development，the environmental iSSUCS become increasingly prominent， which also caused the increasing number of civil disputes．To effectively and fairly solve the environmental issues in civil disputes，not only safeguard the legal rights and interests ofcitizens，but also to the stable development of society．In order to resolve the environmental civil disputes， in addition to reform the litigation system，the co嘶es actively develop a variety of alternative dispute resolution of environmental dispute as well．While consummating the litigation system 0111country recognizes the role of alternative dispute resolution of environmental civil disputes．However， China s alternative dispute resolution systems are still imp硼cct．Based on this issue the alternative dispute resolution systems of civil disputes were investigated in this paper． In tllis paper, based Oil the nature of the environment and characteristics of civil disputes， according to the theory of Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR), referring the environmental ADR mechanisms of United States,Japan and South Koreas，the environmental ADR mechanisms of china were analyzed．As for its shortcomings，the following areflS were suggested to be optimized in this paper：． emphasis on action mechanism， at the same time pay attention to the Alternative Dispute Resolution；improve our administration system for handling environmental disputes；the establishment of environmental civil dispute arbitration system；give legal effect to the agreements