状态反馈和设计实例-238304064.pptVIP

III.4 State Feedback Design III.4.1 design problem III.4.2 LQR and III.4.3 An example of application III.4.4 Small Signal Stability Analysis III.4.1 Consider a system as below: III.4.3 Excitation and Governor Control LQR design method H∞ design method Generator Control System Excitation and Governor Control by H∞ and LQR Comparison between H∞ and LQR Conclusion (1) LQR design method Strict mathematic model, clear objective and systematic design method Lack of consideration for disturbances Require accurate system model to obtain optimal control rule (3) Generator Control System The model ——The coordinated control between excitation and governor. III.4.4 Small Signal Stability Analysis Decentralized control system vs Wide-area control system The system model The Model for H∞ control design Control result H∞ Norm—An Index for small disturbance stability Remark (1) Decentralized control system vs Wide-area control system (1) Decentralized control system vs Wide-area control system (2) The system model (3) The Model for H∞ control design (4) Control result Homework Prove Th.4 from Th.3 Compute the ∞-norm of the following system The dynamic response of H∞ control system is better the one of LQR system. The gain of H ∞ control system is larger then the one of LQR system (5) Comparison between H∞ and LQR As fault a is considered, the best dynamic responses are obtained, which shows that the single phase fault to ground impacts the system greatest. (5) Comparison between H∞ and LQR (6) Conclusion Generator control systems based on H∞ theories could attenuate different disturbances and limit their impacts. The dynamic response of the proposed control system under single phase to ground fault is simulated and analyzed. It proves that the H∞ control system is more robust than LQR ones in this situations. It should be noticed that the proposed control system needs higher control gains. (3) The Model for H∞ control des