临床评价深圳市社区中医药工作评价指标的德尔菲法筛选.PDFVIP

Drug Evaluation Research 第 37 卷 第 4 期 2014 年 8 月 - 355 - • 临床评价 • 深圳市社区中医药工作评价指标的德尔菲法筛选 1 2* 2 1 叶宜根 ，陈渊青 ，罗 红 ，吴成秋 1. 南华大学公共卫生学院，湖南 衡阳 421008 2. 深圳市福田区妇幼保健院，广东 深圳 518045 摘 要：目的 筛选出一套代表性好、实用性强的社区中医药发展评价指标体系，能准确反映社区中医药工作开展的情况。 方法 通过 2 轮德尔菲专家咨询法筛选出社区中医药评价指标。结果 2 轮德尔菲筛选出评价指标 35 个，专家咨询的积极 系数依次为 88.46%、100.0%、协调系数依次为 0.36、0.62，权威程度为 0.824 和 0.848 。结论 本研究德尔菲专家咨询积极 系数较高，权威度和协调度有所上升，初步确立了深圳市社区实用中医药评价指标体系。 关键词：中医药；德尔菲法；社区医药服务 中图分类号：R952 文献标志码：A 文章编号：1674 - 6376 (2014) 04 - 0355 - 04 DOI: 10.7501/j.issn.1674-6376.2014.04.015 Evaluation indicators of community traditional Chinese medicine in Shenzhen by Delphi method 1 2 2 1 YE Yi-gen , CHEN Yuan-qing , LUO Hong , WU Cheng-qiu 1. Public Health College, South China University, Hengyang 421008, China 2. Health Service Center of Maternal and Child, Futian Districtin Shenzhen City, Shenzhen 518045, China Abstract: Objective To select a set of well representative and practicable evaluation indicator system of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) development in the community, which can accurately reflect the situation of TCM development in the community. Methods The core indices of development assessment for community TCM were selected by two rounds of Delphi experts consultation method. Results After two rounds of selections by Delphi method, 35 indices were screened out, and the positive coefficients were 88.46% and 100.0%. The coordinate coefficients were 0.36 and 0.62, and the authority scores were 0.824 and 0.848, respectively. Conclusion The positive coefficient of Delphi expert consultation in this research is relatively high, and the authority value and coordination value have increased. It has preliminarily established the Practical