C反应蛋白和白细胞联合检测在儿科细菌性感染疾病诊断中的应用.docxVIP

C反应蛋白和白细胞联合检测在儿科细菌性感染疾病诊断中的应用.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
C反应蛋白和白细胞联合检测在儿科细菌性感染疾病诊断中的应用

C反应蛋白和白细胞联合检测在儿科细菌性感染疾病诊断中的应用   【摘要】 目的 分析C反应蛋白和白细胞联合检测在儿科细菌性感染疾病诊断中的应用。方法 120例患儿, 将细菌性感染的60例患儿设为分析组, 无细菌性感染的60例患儿设为对照组。对两组患儿进行C反应蛋白和WBC检测, 比较两组患儿的C反应蛋白和WBC阳性情况。结果 分析组患儿的C反应蛋白阳性例数为49例, 阳性率为%;阴性例数为11例, 阴性率为%;对照组患儿的C反应蛋白阳性例数为8例, 阳性率为%;阴性例数为52例, 阴性率为%;分析组患儿的C反应蛋白阳性率高于对照组, 差异有统计学意义。分析组患儿的WBC阳性例数为34例, 阳性率为%;阴性例数为26例, 阴性率为%;对照组患儿的WBC阳性例数为4例, 阳性率为%;阴性例数为56例, 阴性率为%;分析组患儿的WBC阳性率高于对照组, 差异有统计学意义。分析组患儿的C反应蛋白阳性率高于WBC, 差异有统计学意义。结论 C反应蛋白和WBC联合检测在儿科细菌性感染疾病诊断中具有重要应用意义, 是体现早期诊断和监测治疗的重要指标, 为抗生素的正确使用和预后做铺垫。   【关键词】 C反应蛋白;白细胞;联合检测;细菌性感染疾病;诊断   DOI://   【Abstract】 Objective To analyze the application of combined detection of C reactive protein and white blood cell in the diagnosis of pediatric bacterial infection. Methods There were 60 children with bacterial infection as analysis group, and 60 children without bacterial infection as control group. The C reaction protein and WBC were detected in two groups, and the positive conditions of C reactive protein and WBC in the two groups were compared. Results The analysis group had 19 C reactive protein positive cases, with positive rate as %, 11 negative cases, with negative rate as %, while the control group had 8 C reactive protein positive cases, with positive rate as %, 52 negative cases, with negative rate as %. The analysis group had higher C reactive protein positive rate than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant . The analysis group had 34 WBC positive cases, with positive rate as %, 26 negative cases, with negative rate as %, while the control group had 4 WBC positive cases, with positive rate as %,   56 negative cases, with negative rate as %. The analysis group had higher WBC positive rate than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant . The C reactive protein positive rate in analysis group was higher than WBC positive rate, and the difference was statistically significant .   Conclusion Combined detection of C reactive protein and WBC has important application significan

文档评论(0)

manyu + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档