对外经济贸易大学859法学专业英语考研模拟试题.docxVIP

对外经贸大学2012年研究生入学考试模拟试题三 科目代码859科目名称 科目代码 859 科目名称 法学专业英语 ?、英文案例分析（共3题，每题40分，共120分） 案例… ■ cause of action According to the Korean liquor tax law, South Korea imposed on domestic shochu 35% tax, while other imported dist订led spirits (whiskey，vodka, rum, etc.) the tax rate is 100%. European Community and the United States that South Korea violated GATT1947 third paragraph 2， that the national treatment provisions of the domestic tax. The key is to det ermine the case of whiskey, vodka and other distilled spirits and traditional Korean soju are the same product. According to GATT Article 3, paragraph 2, only the tax on the same product is higher than the domestic product of circumstances can invoke this sectioru If it is not the same product, different taxes levied for granted. In preparation, specifically to the Japanese consulting lawyer Korea (Japan had a similar case), what kind of person suitable for the case of experts. Japan gives a very practical significance of the proposal. Japan said that since alcohol is involved in this case, the experts themselves who should be drinking, so he can taste the difference between whiskey and shochu. In addition，South Korea that in order to prove that shochu and whiskey are not the same product, the price differenee from the start. Whiskey 12 times more expensive than shochu. In accordance with the general antitrust rules, there is such a huge price gap bet ween the two products is compet itive and does not constitute an alternative (and thus not the same product)? South Korea that if there is an antitrust expert lawyers in the background, it will help the identificeition of products from the same for the case to open the gap. South Korea also actively preparing for the respondent from all aspects of materials. For example, in a European Community was published in the food exports to South Korea REVIEW found the most convincing evidenee. This book tells the liquor soju and whiskey different. In addition, South Korea, focusing