检索抗辩权问题研究-民商法学专业论文.docxVIP

摘要检索抗辩权是保证人专享的一项重要权利。检索抗辩权制度的完善与否， 摘要 检索抗辩权是保证人专享的一项重要权利。检索抗辩权制度的完善与否， 关系到作为保障交易安全重要方式之一的保证制度能否得到充分有效的利用， 并进而关系到社会交易的活跃、社会财富的流动以及其价值实现的程度。虽然 自古罗马优帝一世以来，承继罗马法传统的大陆法系诸国大多都建立了检索抗 辩权制度，但各国的规定不尽一致，相异其趣。有些问题观点不一，尚悬而未 决。_本文从检索抗辩权的一般理论出发，对检索抗辩权的行使要件进行了分析 研究。为更好地平衡债权人和保证人间的利益冲突，使保证制度得以充分发挥 其作用，本文认为对检索抗辩权应进行适当的扩展。检索抗辩权制度牵涉保证 人顺序利益相对人、保证人和保证人的请求权人这三方主体。作为保护保证人 利益的一种制度设计，检索抗辩权的扩展可从保证人顺序利益相对人和保证人 的请求权人这两个方向考虑。就保证人顺序利益相对人而言，检索抗辩权可扩 展至同一债权上的物保第三人；就保证人的请求权人而言，检索抗辩权可扩展 至共同保证中先行超额履行保证债务的保证人。检索抗辩权的扩展需要满足。 定的条件。本文对我国担保法中的相关规定进行了分析研究，提出了修改和完 善的建议。 关键词：保证、检索抗辩权、扩展、担保法 中图分类号：D923．3 AbstractPreceding Abstract Preceding Defense is an打npOrtant right excIusiVely 0wned by guarantOl and the perfec乜On 0f the institution 0f this right is not only cOncemed wjth t11e su仟jcient and ef，b甜ve use of the guaranly jnstjtutjon whjc|1 js One Of the important ways of d elfending t阳nsaction safe妣but w．th the actiV-ty of socjal transactiOn，the stream of sOcial weaIth and the degree Of the reaIizatiOn Of social weafth．AIthOugh most continentaI law system cOuntries that succeeded t0 the Rome Law traditiOn had crea把d the instjtutions of Preceding Defense， the contains of them are dl仟erent and fbcus on diverse subjects． 丁he viewpOints upOn sOme questiOns are di仟erent at the same time and can’t have un_form cOncfusiOn sO faL Beginning frOm the generaf lheO吖of Preceding Defense．the lhesis dOes the research tO the e×ercjse eIements Of Preceding Defense．Jn order to be牡er pojse the confljct of jnterest between credjtOr and guarantor，and to su衔cientIy pe—brm the guaranty institution，this thesis thinks the e)cIen亭iOn c汗the Preceding Def色nse is advisabIe．The institution Of the Preceding Defense is releVant tO the three parties：guarantor Order counterpart the guarantoL and the cIaimer of guarantOL As an institu“on design of prOtecljng lhe jnlerest 0f gUaranIO‘the extensjon 0f the Preceding Defense may start from the tvv0 directjOns，the guarantOr Order counterpart and the cIa．rner Of guarantOr As far as the guarantOr Orde