金融诈骗犯罪若干疑难问题研究-刑法学专业论文.docxVIP

法实践中成为本罪的主体的可能性。 法实践中成为本罪的主体的可能性。 第三部分：信用证诈骗罪疑难问题研究．本罪存在行为犯和结果犯两 说之争，本文基于应然的角度赞同行为犯说．“骗取信用谚’的行为既遂条 件是骗取获得信用证，并实施了诈骗活动。基于行为犯说，信用证项下货 款是否实际受损，只是量刑情节而非定罪情节。 第四部分：恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪疑难问题研究．恶意透支型信用 卡诈骗罪中的非法占有的目的，应理解为意图占有他入财物，是对他人财 产所有权的永久剥夺。行为人除了客观E超过法定限额透支等行为外，还 要求行为人具有非法占有的目的，这一内容不是由法条规定的客观行为推 定出来的，而是一个独立的须单独认定的定罪要件。在目前的技术条件下， ‘‘超限额”恶意透支构成犯罪不能成立。‘‘超期限”恶意透支的规定可修改 为：持卡人以非法占有为目的，明知无力归还，透支超过发卡银行规定期 限；或者自收到发卡银行催收i亘知后，逃避追查，不能说明正当理由，3个 月内拒不归还的行为。‘催收不还?要件合理目必要，但应当保持法典中类 似条件类似理解。 Crime Crime offirmeial fraud is regulated by the鼢section ofcrime of颤跏嘶119 socialist market economy order under alap缸three of Specitic Provisions of Criminal Law which is a sub-category蕊cL麟瓶皿lis thesis is 011 sevoal issues ofdifficultywithregwdto协isc龇egoryofcrime． Tbisthesisconsisteoffourpmtsandmound30,000wot以 Part one：on日liWgult issues of Crime of Loan Fraud．W弛问筚rd to loan fraud涮鹤thatcommitted by咄ttlis tt硷sis agrees to theⅨ脚m∞ty锄【Ⅻ_lg妇 iII鹤pec帆of m妇00mn蝴loan觚govemors and pe措ons with direct fes删biliIy of the units sh眦ld be liable to pImjsIHIlem just as punishment in load缸铷d a佃e committed by natural Da暑∞In terms ofhow to should be consistent witll恤酬Oll oilier four legal elements．It is iIIIeI卿‘other m耐’objectively requjIed by the le斟幽ml鲫皓ofthis crime9 it of suggestedintothe脚ofcrimimlhw．Also．thisdiesissnaiyzed位determineonofto replace‘load’by‘credie’in order to include fraud credit-grating m衄e ofsome con-aniunent such as fraud b啜Tc咖form b{mb． Part two：on d加丘cult issues ofCrime ofFraud of腿nlis tI豫出made锄 mmlysis ofissues regarding file five legal modes constituting crime offraud ofbills under article 194 ofC触ml L矗氍W弛resp。ct to the de．milton ofm她 u∞of自hi程吐ed甜】d fjked bills，bill臼hic缸．mg讪cl妇ille酣抽商越ion of吐豫 forms of bills and falsehood of o嘎嬲略of吐硷bmboth of which ale so misleacIjI培1ll砒鹏唧略i出童ed留咖d豫Faked bills肿genuine bills which however出℃faked in terms of contents of bills except signame．Alteration of 确驴船ofbills is觚act of自hic鲥II培bills．Ⅳ峨u∞ofbills m鳓s acaieving tlw value ofbills aS ifthey were genu妇by伽眨帆船呱穗lIil骣协掣