对“十七年”女性文学史建构的省思.pdfVIP

2011 年5 月 妇女研究论丛 May. 2011 第3 期 总第105 期 Collection of Women爷s Studies No.3 Ser.No.105 对“十七年”女性文学史建构的省思 宋声泉 （南开大学 文学院，天津 300071） 关键词：“十七年”；女性文学史；建构；省思 摘 要：“十七年”女性文学史的建构在诸多方面均存在不足。史家对“十七年”女性文学史的发展规律缺乏科学的认识，一 方面是因为史观的陈旧和史识的偏执，另一方面则是史料的问题。研究“十七年”的女性创作首先应该具有版本的意识，还应该 在已有文献的基础上展开“辑佚”的工作。一个较为可取的女性文学史建构方式是在已有的多种研究方法的基础上引入性别视 角下的两性文本比较研究。比较式的性别分析不应是艺术价值高低的判断，不能仅仅依据一部作品的性别内涵便将其过分地拔 高或是全盘地否定，而只需尽可能客观地呈现其所具有的性别文化内涵。这是一种既不失思想文化的超前性又比较具有现实可 行性的学术选择。 中图分类号：I206.7 文献标识：A 文章编号：1004-2563（2011 ）03-0091-06 SONG Sheng-quan (SchoolofLiterature atthe Nankai University,Tianjin300071, China) seventeen-years, Chinese history of womens literature, construction, reflections The construction of seventeen-years Chinese history of womens literature has many deficiencies. Historians may be short on presenting a scientific recognition of the dynamics of its development largely because of old-fashioned outlook, which has perhaps led to narrow-minded knowledge of history, and shortage of historical sources. Those who are studying the seventeen-years history of womens literature should first be aware of the editions of a literary work. Collecting the lost works is also important. One of the most effective methods is introducing a comparative study of the texts written by women and men from a gender perspective. This study should neither be a judgment of artistic value alone nor an evaluation of a piece of literary work only by its gender consciousness. It is best to combine the two as objectively as possible. This is a suitable scholarly choice, not only because it helps uphold forward-looking outlooks and cultural perspectives, but a