《老子想尔注》诠释老子方法析论.PDFVIP

台北大學中文學報 創刊號 2006 233 ∗ 《老子想爾注》詮釋老子方法析論 ∗∗ 李宗定 摘 要 《老子想爾注》吸收了漢代神仙方術、養生術、房中術及讖緯神學 等內容，並以老子「道」論建立其神學的核心，是原始道教注老的重要 文獻。然《想爾注》對《老子》進行道教式的解說，使成為道教尊崇的 對象，似有「利用」《老子》之嫌，而不同於一般為闡明經文的注疏學。 故對《老子想爾注》進行詮釋方法的考察，有助於理解《老子》在多大 的程度上「涉入」了道教教義。本文擬以《老子想爾注》為核心，除了 梳理其注疏《老子》時所採取的詮釋策略，再進一步對比《老子河上公 章句》及王弼《老子道德經注》中對《老子》的詮釋與運用。同時比較 楚竹簡與漢帛書的經文，指出《老子想爾注》依「選字」、「減字」、「斷 句」及「移義」等方法，調整《老子》經文，藉以引申出其道教長生成 仙之說。 關鍵詞：老子、道教、老子想爾注、老子河上公章句、老子道德經注、 詮釋 ∗ 收到日期 2006/02/27 ，修改日期2006/06/28 ，接受日期2006/07/04 ∗∗ 實踐大學高雄校區通識中心助理教授 234 Journal of Chinese Language and Literature of National Taipei University, Vol. 1, 2006 A Study of Interpretative Method on Lao-Zi Xiang-Er Commentary ∗ ∗∗ Lee Tsung-Ting Abstract “Lao-Zi Xiang-Er Commentary” is the important interpretation of Taoism of Lao-Zi. It is very different from other Commentary to Lao-Zi and covered some new ground like health-preserving, celestial, and Fun-Chang (房中) thought. We care about, Xiang-Er Commentary has absorbed Lao-Zi to what degree. In other words, it changed how much significance from commenting Lao-Zi. This article draws up by “Lao-Zi Xiang-Er Commentary” are the core, the annotation strategy which except combs its explanatory notes and commentaries Lao-Zi when adopts, again further contrasts “Lao-Zi He-Shang-Kung Zhan