原创力文档- 1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Abstract: Judges elucidation originated in Germany in the continental law
system. It’s on the parties debating doctrine and disposition doctrine lawsuit mode.
Elucidation can contribute to the realization of substantial justice; it does will also prevent
litigation raid. Meanwhile, elucidation has efficiency value, and can promote the judicial
credibility. Rational does no harm to the judge neutrality. Elucidation existed long ago. In
our country, Judges elucidation mainly reflected in Regulations on Civil Evidence of the
Supreme Court judicial explanation, other files which formulated by the Supreme Court
contains such content. In China, elucidation is essentially an obligation of the judge
according to the law. These regulations achieve the purpose of protecting right and
vindicating justice . However, there are drawbacks. I throw out some suggestions in this
thesis.
Key Words: civil procedure; elucidation; debating doctrine; disposition doctrine;
improving
万方数据
目录
目 录
引言 1
第1 章 法官释明概述 2
1.1 法官释明的含义2
1.2 释明制度的起源与发展2
1.3 释明性质的澄清4
1.4 释明的分类5
1.4.1 辩论性释明与处分性释明 ···············5
1.4.2 消极释明与积极释明 ·················6
1.4.3 事实释明与法律释明 ·················6
第2 章 法官释明的理论基础及其意义 7
2.1 释明制度与相关诉讼原则的关系7
2.1.1 释明制度与辩论主义 ·················7
2.1.2 释明制度与处分主义 ·················8
2.1.3 释明制
文档评论（0）