论动产抵押权对传统大陆法系担保物权体系的悖反与融入——以动产抵押权善意取得为例.pdfVIP

因。借助类型思维，固守传统传统动产担保物权公示方法的一元性遭到批判。藉此笔者 将登记公示引入动产担保物权，从而构造动产担保物权公示方式的二元并立局面，进一 步佐证了民事领域动产质权以移转占有为其公示方式与商事领域动产抵押权以登记作 为其公示方式的二元并立的可行性。而后从物权变动所涉之内、外部关系，作为抽象权 利而存在的动产抵押权对公示要素的依赖以及从静、动态法律关系中物权公示的意义等 三个角度力证了动产抵押权必须采登记生效主义，从而批判了《物权法》第一百八十八 条所采之公示对抗主义的立法选择。原本动产抵押权之所以无法参照适用《物权法》第 一百零六条的概念性障碍亦被扫除，其善意取得的构成要件得以重塑。 第四部分主要讲述动产抵押权概念的重塑。综上，动产抵押权之概念重塑得以型构： 其乃是设立于动产之上，必须以登记方式设立，且适用于商事领域的动产担保物权。动 产担保物权的体系因此亦得以构筑：民事领域以移转占有为公示方式的动产质权与商事 领域以登记为公示方式的动产抵押权，二者并行不悖！而以动产抵押权之物权概念为基 础的动产抵押权善意取得制度亦借此得以重构。 关键词：动产抵押权；善意取得；概念法学；抽象概念；抽象概念体系；类型；公 示生效 2 Abstract This essay consists of four parks. The first part represents the contradiction between chattel mortgage and the real right for security in traditional law system. Due to the lack of announcement ,chattel mortgage is not in compliance with the traditional principle of property announcement doctrine into effect; the alteration pattern through inner idea makes it a secret property right which is not to the world; the so-called law in which the property right shall not against the third party unless it has been announced, makes the property right lack of the power to function against the third party , in so much that it is set aside by the legislator and put together with the common credit right, which is contradictory to the property right. In a word ,the chattel mortgage is not a kind of property right. The bring-in of chattel mortgage tears the system of security interests and impact the concept of property right in traditional continental law system. For example, in the principle of acquiring in good faith, chattel mortgage is short of announcement so that it has no basis, either does the property alteration. Therefore, the principle of acquiring in good faith is not appropriate for it. However, with the development of the economy, a contradiction betwee