网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

贵州省毕节石桥喀斯特小流域水土流失防治措施的效应分析-校内导师; 喻理飞专业论文.docxVIP

贵州省毕节石桥喀斯特小流域水土流失防治措施的效应分析-校内导师; 喻理飞专业论文.docx

  1. 1、本文档共61页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
PAGE PAGE 5 起很大作用,产沙量为梯土水土保持林荒山荒坡经果林坡耕地坡耕撂荒地, 径流深为梯土水土保持林荒山荒坡经果林坡耕地坡耕撂荒地,说明水土保 持林具较好的效果。 (5)坡耕地特别是裸露坡耕地的保水保土效果最差。没有作物的坡耕地、 有作物的坡耕地的土壤侵蚀模数分别为100.96(t/km2.a)、 40.89(t/km2.a),分别是 坡改梯(11.62(t/km2.a))的8.69倍、3.52倍,说明坡改梯是解决坡耕地水土流失 的有效途径,通过坡改梯工程,降低坡度的途径可有效地降低土壤侵蚀模数。 关键词:效应分析,防治措施,水土流失,喀斯特小流域,石桥,贵州 Effect analysis of prevention measures on soil erosion of Shiqiao-Karst-watershed of Bijie City in Guizhou Province Abstract : A comprehensive control area on soil erosion was studied.by different treatmental measures in this paper. Some indexes of slope degree slope length were measuered. Datas of 23 runoff plots and 10 typical farmers and 3 plots of communities were gathered from 2005 to 2009. Characteristics on sands and effects of measures were analynied. The results showed that as follows. It were positive correlation between precipitation and runoff amounts and depth. However it was negative correlation between precipitation intensity.. There is no surface runoff while precipitation ≦ 5mm per time. Runoff depth and sediment yield increased compareing with the precipitation(5mm intensity). It showed that the precipitation of 5mm per time was the main factor of soil erosion. Slope affected runoff depth. The runoff depth was 392mm 10° (at 5°.), 404mm 15°(at 10°), 423mm(at 20°), 423mm( 25°), 424mm( 30°) ,438mmand 442mm( 40°). It showed depth inveresed companing with slope incresing. Slope impactd the soil erosion modulus. The soil erosion modulus were 38.08(t/km2.a) 10° and 83.90(t/km2.a) 15° and 120.50(t/km2.a) 20°, 136.21(t/km2.a) 25° and 210.50(t/km2.a) 30°and 272.71(t/km2.a) 40°and 308.08(t/km2.a) at 5° slope. It showed runoff depth was positively corralated with slope. The effects the runoff depth and amounts were different measures. Effects of runoff depth was ordered by Terracing < soil and water conservation forest < economic fruit forest < farmland < slope farmland;soil and water erosionfield. Amounts of water-soil-erosion affected the ru

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

1234554321 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档