科学证据的程序功能及其实现-法律专业毕业论文.docxVIP

摘要关于科学证据的文章可谓汗牛充栋，其中绝大多数是对所谓鉴 摘要 关于科学证据的文章可谓汗牛充栋，其中绝大多数是对所谓鉴 定体制的批评与设计，对于科学证据的基本问题以及法官如何审查 认定科学证据的论文却寥若星辰。随着科学技术向社会生活各个方 面的渗透，现代纠纷与科学已经密不可分，科学证据成为新的“证 据之王”，对法官裁判权形成了巨大的冲击。本文以法官如何审查 认定科学证据，限制专家话语权扩张对纠纷解决机制的侵袭为立论 平台，从实证分析我国目前鉴定体制的混乱切入，从科学哲学的角 度阐述了科学知识的本体论问题，以此为平台，分析了科学证据的 概念、科学证据的程序功能，研究了科学证据的价值，提出科学证 据可采的标准应当是：依据的科学知识具有有效性，与待证事实具 有相关性，方法和结论具有可靠性。在比较外国科学证据模式的基 础上，充分考量了中国的诉讼文化，以及正在出现的与两大法系先 进诉讼文化融合的趋势，以正当程序的理念为指导，以科学证据可 采性规则为基点，提出了单一专家证人和法院专家顾问的科学证据 程序功能模式，并对这一模式的主要规范进行了论证。 关键词：科学证据程序功能可采性专家证人科学知识 AbstractArticles Abstract Articles about scientific evidence may be said enough to fill the roof,overwhelming majority are criticism and design to identification system while being SO—called among them，however，thesis of basic problem about scientific evidence and the judge how to examine and assert scientific evidence is rare like stars in morning．To the infiltration of social life of various fields with science and technology, modern dispute and science have been already inseparable，The scientific evidence becomes the new”king of the evidence”，has formed the enormous impact to judge’S judgement right．This text set forth one’S views in the platform with the judge how to examine and assert scientific evidence，how to restrain invasion and attack to the mechanism of dispute solves from expansion of expert discourse-right． This text begins with analysis that our country appraises the confusion of the system at present in real example，exposing ontology question of the scientific knowledge in terms of philosophy of science，Regarding this as the platform，the text has analysed the concept of the scientific evidence，procedure function of the scientific evidence，studied the value of the scientific evidence，put forward standard that scientific evidence Can adopt should be：The scientific knowledge of the basis has validity，relevancy with the factum probanda The method and conclusion have reliability．On the basis of comparing more foreign scientific evidence mode，Fully consider th